ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2021
Boundary Coding Representation for Organ Segmentation in Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy.
Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Deep CNN-based Fully Automated Segmentation of Pelvic Multi-Organ on CT Images for Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy.Journal of biomedical physics & engineering · 2025Article
- Deep learning-aided 3D proxy-bridged region-growing framework for multi-organ segmentation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Deep-learning-based segmentation using individual patient data on prostate cancer radiation therapy.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate segmentation of the prostate and organs at risk (OARs, e.g., bladder and rectum) in male pelvic CT images is a critical step for prostate cancer radiotherapy. Unfortunately, the unclear organ boundary and large shape variation make the segmentation task very challenging. Previous studies usually used representations defined directly on unclear boundaries as context information to guide segmentation. Those boundary representations may not be so discriminative, resulting in limited performance improvement. To this end, we propose a novel boundary coding network (BCnet) to learn a discriminative representation for organ boundary and use it as the context information to guide the segmentation. Specifically, we design a two-stage learning strategy in the proposed BCnet: 1) Boundary coding representation learning. Two sub-networks under the supervision of the dilation and erosion masks transformed from the manually delineated organ mask are first separately trained to learn the spatial-semantic context near the organ boundary. Then we encode the organ boundary based on the predictions of these two sub-networks and design a multi-atlas based refinement strategy by transferring the knowledge from training data to inference. 2) Organ segmentation. The boundary coding representation as context information, in addition to the image patches, are used to train the final segmentation network. Experimental results on a large and diverse male pelvic CT dataset show that our method achieves superior performance compared with several state-of-the-art methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.