Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32955943›Full record

ArticleJCO global oncology2020

Follow-Up Care for Breast and Colorectal Cancer Across the Globe: Survey Findings From 27 Countries.

Michelle A Mollica, Deborah K Mayer, Kevin C Oeffinger, Youngmee Kim, Susan S Buckenmaier, Sudha Sivaram, Catherine Muha, Nur Aishah Taib, Elisabeth Andritsch, Chioma C Asuzu and 23 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO global oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A qualitative descriptive study on the perspectives and experiences of multidisciplinary HCPs in providing nutritional care to older adults with cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors at 20 institutions in 26 countries.

Michelle A MollicaNational Cancer Institute Bethesda, MD.
Deborah K MayerUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Kevin C OeffingerDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
Youngmee KimUniversity of Miami, Coral Gables, FL.
Susan S BuckenmaierNational Cancer Institute Bethesda, MD.
Sudha SivaramNational Cancer Institute Bethesda, MD.
Catherine MuhaNational Cancer Institute Bethesda, MD.
Nur Aishah TaibGraddip Genet Counsell, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Elisabeth AndritschMedizinische Universitat Graz, Graz, Austria.
Chioma C AsuzuUniversity of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Ovidiu V BochisUniversitatea de Medicina si Farmacie Iuliu Hatieganu Facultatea de Medicina, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Sheila DiazUniversidad Autonoma de Santo Domingo Facultad Ciencias de la Salud, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.
Maria Die TrillHospital General Universitario Gregorio Maranon, Madrid, Spain.
Patricia J GarciaUniversidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
Luigi GrassiUniversity of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Yosuke UchitomiNational Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Asim Jamal ShaikhAga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Michael JeffordPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Hyun Jeong LeeNational Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Christoffer JohansenRigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Emmanuel LuyirikaAfrican Palliative Care Association, Kampala, Uganda.
Elizabeth Jane MaherMacmillan Cancer Support, London, United Kingdom.
Maria Madeline B MallillinAsian Hospital and Medical Center, Muntinlupa, Philippines.
Theoneste ManiragabaRepublic of Rwanda Ministry of Health, Kigali, Rwanda.
Anja Mehnert-TheuerkaufUniversitat Medical Center Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
C S PrameshTata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
Sabine SieslingNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation and University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
Orit SpiraIsrael Cancer Association, Givatayim, Israel.
Jonathan SussmanMcMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Lili TangPeking University Cancer Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Nguyen V HaiHo Chi Minh City University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Suayib YalcinHacettepe University Institute of Cancer, Ankara, Turkey.
Paul B JacobsenNational Cancer Institute Bethesda, MD.
National Cancer Institute · USAfrican Palliative Care Association · UGAga Khan University · PKAsian Hospital and Medical Center · PHDuke University · USHacettepe University Hospital · TRHo Chi Minh City Medicine and Pharmacy University · VNHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ESIsrael Cancer Association · ILIuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROLeipzig University · DEMacmillan Cancer Support · GBMcMaster University · CAMedical University of Graz · ATMinistry of Health · RWNational Cancer Center · KRPeking University · CNPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AUTata Memorial Hospital · INTokyo National Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to describe follow-up care for breast and colorectal cancer survivors in countries with varying levels of resources and highlight challenges regarding posttreatment survivorship care.

methodsWe surveyed one key stakeholder from each of 27 countries with expertise in survivorship care on questions including the components/structure of follow-up care, delivery of treatment summaries and survivorship care plans, and involvement of primary care in survivorship. Descriptive analyses were performed to characterize results across countries and variations between the WHO income categories (low, middle, high). We also performed a qualitative content analysis of narratives related to survivorship care challenges to identify major themes.

resultsSeven low- or /lower-middle-income countries (LIC/LMIC), seven upper-middle-income countries (UMIC), and 13 high-income countries (HICs) were included in this study. Results indicate that 44.4% of countries with a National Cancer Control Plan currently address survivorship care. Additional findings indicate that HICs use guidelines more often than those in LICs/LMICs and UMICs. There was great variation among countries regardless of income level. Common challenges include issues with workforce, communication and care coordination, distance/transportation issues, psychosocial support, and lack of focus on follow-up care.

conclusionThis information can guide researchers, providers, and policy makers in efforts to improve the quality of survivorship care on a national and global basis. As the number of cancer survivors increases globally, countries will need to prioritize their long-term needs. Future efforts should focus on efforts to bridge oncology and primary care, building international partnerships, and implementation of guidelines.

Indexed as

AftercareColorectal NeoplasmsHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesSurvivorsSurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID32955943
PMCPMC7529533
OpenAlexW3087394253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.