Trial reportDer Anaesthesist2020
Ultrasound-guided erector spinae block versus mid-transverse process to pleura block for postoperative analgesia in lumbar spinal surgery.
Trial report in Der Anaesthesist, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06815146 (Comparison of the Effects of Erector Spinae Area), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of the Effects of Erector Spinae Area (ESP) Block and Mid-Transverse Process to Pleura Block(MTP) on Postoperative Opioid Consumption and Quality of Recovery in Lumbar Spinal Surgery
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.
- Erector spinae plane block for postoperative pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Erector spinae plane block for postoperative pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Efficacy of erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia lumbar surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC anesthesiology · 2023Pooled it
- Efficacy of Erector Spinae Nerve Block for Pain Control After Spinal Surgeries: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Efficacy of Postoperative Analgesia by Erector Spinal Plane Block after Lumbar Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block in Thoracolumbar Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2021Pooled it
- Intertransverse process and modified thoracolumbar interfascial plane blocks compared with conventional analgesia in lumbar disc herniation surgery: a randomized controlled trial.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Trial
- Impact of Erector Spinae Plane Block on Postoperative Analgesia and Perioperative Stress Response in Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Trial
- Intertransverse process block versus subcostal transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical gastrectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Trial
- Efficacy of erector spinae plane block on postoperative pain in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2022Trial
- Postoperative analgesic efficacy of intertransverse process block vs. erector spinae plane block in total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized double-blind trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Non-efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block in postoperative analgesia of non-instrumented spine surgery: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.Brain & spine · 2025Article
- Ultrasound Identification of an Atypical Course of the Posterior Intercostal Artery During Paravertebral Block.Cureus · 2025Article
- Bilateral erector spinae plane block for postoperative pain relief in lumbar spine surgery: A PRISMA-compliant updated systematic review & meta-analysis.World neurosurgery: X · 2024Review
- Midpoint transverse process to pleura block for postoperative analgesia following laparoscopic renal cyst decortication: Two case reports.World journal of clinical cases · 2024Article
- Efficacy of erector spine plane block in two different approaches to lumbar spinal fusion surgery: a retrospective pilot study.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Erector Spinae Plane Block for Perioperative Pain Management in Lumbar Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of pain research · 2023Review
- The Effect of Single-Shot Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) on Opioid Consumption for Various Surgeries: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of pain research · 2022Review
- Erector spinae plane block for spinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The Korean journal of pain · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn recent years, promising results were achieved with the use of ultrasound (US)-guided interfascial plane blocks for effective postoperative analgesia in several surgeries. Erector spina plane (ESP) block and mid-transverse to pleura plane (MTP) block are the latest techniques in this area. The aim of this prospective and randomized study was to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of bilateral ESP and MTP blocks in patients undergoing lumbar spinal surgery under general anesthesia (GA).
methodsA total of 120 adult patients were included in the study and randomized into 3 groups: group ESP (n = 40), group MTP (n = 40) and group Control (n = 40). The patients in the group ESP received a bilateral block by injecting 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine at a vertebrae level in the mid-point of the incision before GA. The same LA was administrated bilaterally at the T12/L1 level in the group MTP. Postoperatively, a multimodal analgesic regimen including an intravenous tramadol patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), paracetamol and dexketoprofen was used in all groups. Postoperative pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS) during the first 48 postoperative hours. Pethidine was used as a rescue analgesic when VAS score was >3. Primary outcome measure was mean pain scores. Secondary outcome measures were consumption of rescue analgesic and the amount of tramadol delivered by PCA. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
resultsMean VAS scores were significantly higher in the group Control than in the group MTP and group ESP at all-time points during 48 h (Control > MTP > ESP; p < 0.001). Mean VAS scores were lower in group ESP than group MTP in postoperative 12 h (p < 0.001). Rescue analgesic consumption, number of bolus demand on PCA, PCA bolus demand dose, total PCA dose, and complications related to opioid consumption were highest in control group and lowest in ESP group (Control > MTP > ESP; p < 0.001).
conclusionBoth ESP and MTP blocks provided effective pain relief after lumbar spinal surgery but the ESP block was superior to MTP block regarding postoperative analgesia in the first 24 h.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.