Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32955443›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2020

Social Media Listening to Understand the Lived Experience of Presbyopia: Systematic Search and Content Analysis Study.

James S Wolffsohn, Claudia Leteneux-Pantais, Sima Chiva-Razavi, Sarah Bentley, Chloe Johnson, Amy Findley, Chloe Tolley, Rob Arbuckle, Jyothi Kommineni, Nishith Tyagi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Presbyopia: Current Perspectives and Prospects for Patients.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

James S Wolffsohn *Optometry and Vision Science, College of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4673-8927
Claudia Leteneux-Pantais *Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5208-1293
Sima Chiva-Razavi *Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4812-2018
Sarah Bentley *Patient-Centered Outcomes, Adelphi Values Ltd, Bollington, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9914-8934
Chloe Johnson *Patient-Centered Outcomes, Adelphi Values Ltd, Bollington, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2278-2176
Amy Findley *Patient-Centered Outcomes, Adelphi Values Ltd, Bollington, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9887-6956
Chloe Tolley *Patient-Centered Outcomes, Adelphi Values Ltd, Bollington, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3846-9018
Rob Arbuckle *Patient-Centered Outcomes, Adelphi Values Ltd, Bollington, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0345-2523
Jyothi Kommineni *Novartis Business Services, Product Lifecycle Services, Hyderabad, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9257-6135
Nishith Tyagi *Novartis Business Services, Product Lifecycle Services, Hyderabad, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7424-6140

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPresbyopia is defined as the age-related deterioration of near vision over time which is experienced in over 80% of people aged 40 years or older. Individuals with presbyopia have difficulty with tasks that rely on near vision. It is not currently possible to stop or reverse the aging process that causes presbyopia; generally, it is corrected with glasses, contact lenses, surgery, or the use of a magnifying glass.

objectiveThis study aimed to explore how individuals used social media to describe their experience of presbyopia with regard to the symptoms experienced and the impacts of presbyopia on their quality of life.

methodsSocial media sources including Twitter, forums, blogs, and news outlets were searched using a predefined search string relating to symptoms and impacts of presbyopia. The data that were downloaded, based on the keywords, underwent manual review to identify relevant data points. Relevant posts were further manually analyzed through a process of data tagging, categorization, and clustering. Key themes relating to symptoms, impacts, treatment, and lived experiences were identified.

resultsA total of 4456 social media posts related to presbyopia were identified between May 2017 and August 2017. Using a random sampling methodology, we selected 2229 (50.0%) posts for manual review, with 1470 (65.9%) of these 2229 posts identified as relevant to the study objectives. Twitter was the most commonly used channel for discussions on presbyopia compared to forums and blogs. The majority of relevant posts originated in Spain (559/1470, 38.0%) and the United States (426/1470, 29.0%). Of the relevant posts, 270/1470 (18.4%) were categorized as posts written by individuals who have presbyopia, of which 37 of the 270 posts (13.7%) discussed symptoms. On social media, individuals with presbyopia most frequently reported experiencing difficulty reading small print (24/37, 64.9%), difficulty focusing on near objects (15/37, 40.5%), eye strain (12/37, 32.4%), headaches (9/37, 24.3%), and blurred vision (8/37, 21.6%). 81 of the 270 posts (30.0%) discussed impacts of presbyopia-emotional burden (57/81, 70.4%), functional or daily living impacts (46/81, 56.8%), such as difficulty reading (46/81, 56.8%) and using electronic devices (21/81, 25.9%), and impacts on work (3/81, 3.7%).

conclusionsFindings from this social media listening study provided insight into how people with presbyopia discuss their condition online and highlight the impact of presbyopia on individuals' quality of life. The social media listening methodology can be used to generate insights into the lived experience of a condition, but it is recommended that this research be combined with prospective qualitative research for added rigor and for confirmation of the relevance of the findings.

Indexed as

AdultHumansMiddle AgedPresbyopiaQualitative ResearchRetrospective StudiesSearch EngineSocial Mediainfodemiologynear visionpresbyopiasocial mediasocial media listening

Identifiers

PMID32955443
PMCPMC7536603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.