ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2020
Social Media Listening to Understand the Lived Experience of Presbyopia: Systematic Search and Content Analysis Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Social Media Listening to Understand the Lived Experience of Individuals in Europe With Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Systematic Search and Content Analysis Study.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Repeated low-level red-light therapy for improving asthenopic symptoms and accommodation in presbyopia.Annals of medicine · 2026Trial
- Comparison of Clinical Performance and Fit Success of Lehfilcon A and Lotrafilcon B Daily Wear Monthly Replacement Silicone Hydrogel Multifocal Contact Lenses in Patients with Presbyopia.Clinical optometry · 2026Trial
- Presbyopia: Current Perspectives and Prospects for Patients.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026Review
- Using Social Media Listening to Understand the Pressure Injury Experience: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.JMIR nursing · 2026Article
- Extracting Quality of Life Information of Patients Diagnosed With Breast Cancer From Health Care Online Forum Posts: Data Feasibility Study.JMIR cancer · 2026Article
- Exploring the Experiences and Perspectives of Patients With Early Breast Cancer, Caregivers, and Health Care Professionals: Italian Social Media Listening Study.JMIR cancer · 2026Article
- Ethical Considerations for the Use of Social Media in the Human Subjects Research Setting.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- FDA approval of aceclidine (Vizz): a new chapter in nonsurgical presbyopia management.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Article
- Use of Large Language Models to Classify Epidemiological Characteristics in Synthetic and Real-World Social Media Posts About Conjunctivitis Outbreaks: Infodemiology Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Leveraging deep learning to detect stance in Spanish tweets on COVID-19 vaccination.JAMIA open · 2025Article
- Female predominance and socio-demographic inequalities in global near vision loss burden: projected trends and disparities from 1990 to 2035.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Improvement of Presbyopia, Dry Eye, Intraocular Pressure, and Near Vision Through Cassiae Tea Consumption.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Association Between Daily Internet Use and Intrinsic Capacity Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults in China: Large Prospective Cohort Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Perception and awareness of the public about presbyopia and its corrective approaches in Saudi Arabia: a population-based survey.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Psychometric evaluation of the near activity visual questionnaire presbyopia (NAVQ-P) and additional patient-reported outcome items.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2024Article
- Patient Experiences and Insights on Chronic Ocular Pain: Social Media Listening Study.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Content development for a new item-bank for measuring multifocal contact lens performance.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2024Article
- One size fits all: Enhanced zero-shot text classification for patient listening on social media.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2024Article
- Patient Perception and Self-Reported Outcomes with Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lenses (PCIOLs): A Social Media Listening Study.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPresbyopia is defined as the age-related deterioration of near vision over time which is experienced in over 80% of people aged 40 years or older. Individuals with presbyopia have difficulty with tasks that rely on near vision. It is not currently possible to stop or reverse the aging process that causes presbyopia; generally, it is corrected with glasses, contact lenses, surgery, or the use of a magnifying glass.
objectiveThis study aimed to explore how individuals used social media to describe their experience of presbyopia with regard to the symptoms experienced and the impacts of presbyopia on their quality of life.
methodsSocial media sources including Twitter, forums, blogs, and news outlets were searched using a predefined search string relating to symptoms and impacts of presbyopia. The data that were downloaded, based on the keywords, underwent manual review to identify relevant data points. Relevant posts were further manually analyzed through a process of data tagging, categorization, and clustering. Key themes relating to symptoms, impacts, treatment, and lived experiences were identified.
resultsA total of 4456 social media posts related to presbyopia were identified between May 2017 and August 2017. Using a random sampling methodology, we selected 2229 (50.0%) posts for manual review, with 1470 (65.9%) of these 2229 posts identified as relevant to the study objectives. Twitter was the most commonly used channel for discussions on presbyopia compared to forums and blogs. The majority of relevant posts originated in Spain (559/1470, 38.0%) and the United States (426/1470, 29.0%). Of the relevant posts, 270/1470 (18.4%) were categorized as posts written by individuals who have presbyopia, of which 37 of the 270 posts (13.7%) discussed symptoms. On social media, individuals with presbyopia most frequently reported experiencing difficulty reading small print (24/37, 64.9%), difficulty focusing on near objects (15/37, 40.5%), eye strain (12/37, 32.4%), headaches (9/37, 24.3%), and blurred vision (8/37, 21.6%). 81 of the 270 posts (30.0%) discussed impacts of presbyopia-emotional burden (57/81, 70.4%), functional or daily living impacts (46/81, 56.8%), such as difficulty reading (46/81, 56.8%) and using electronic devices (21/81, 25.9%), and impacts on work (3/81, 3.7%).
conclusionsFindings from this social media listening study provided insight into how people with presbyopia discuss their condition online and highlight the impact of presbyopia on individuals' quality of life. The social media listening methodology can be used to generate insights into the lived experience of a condition, but it is recommended that this research be combined with prospective qualitative research for added rigor and for confirmation of the relevance of the findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.