Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32955422›Full record

ArticleBlood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue2021

Maturity Assessment model for Patient Blood Management to assist hospitals in improving patients' safety and outcomes. The MAPBM project.

Elvira Bisbe, Albert Garcia-Casanovas, Carles Illa, Jordi Varela, Misericordia Basora, Marta Barquero, Maria J Colomina, Lucia González, Axel Hofmann, MAPBM Working Group (listed in Appendix 1)

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elvira BisbeAnaesthesia Department, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute, IMIM, Barcelona, Spain.
Albert Garcia-CasanovasPerioperative Medicine Research Group, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute, IMIM, Barcelona, Spain.
Carles IllaHealthcare, IQVIA Spain, Barcelona, Spain.
Jordi VarelaGesclinvar Consulting S. L. Avances en Gestión Clínica, Barcelona, Spain.
Misericordia BasoraAnaesthesia Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Marta BarqueroAnaesthesia Department, Hospital Parc Taulí de Sabadell, Sabadell, Spain.
Maria J ColominaAnaesthesia Department, Hospital Bellvitge, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Lucia GonzálezHealthcare, IQVIA Spain, Barcelona, Spain.
Axel HofmannSchool of Surgery, University of Western Australia and School of Public Health Research, Perth, Australia.
MAPBM Working Group (listed in Appendix 1)MAPBM Working Group.
University Hospital of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient blood management (PBM) is an evidence-based care bundle with proven ability to improve patients' outcomes by managing and preserving the patient's own blood. Since 2010, the World Health Organisation has urged member states to implement PBM. However, there has been limited progress in developing PBM programmes in hospitals due to the implicit challenges of implementing them. To address these challenges, we developed a Maturity Assessment Model (MAPBM) to assist healthcare organisations to measure, benchmark, assess in PBM, and communicate the results of their PBM programmes. We describe the MAPBM model, its benchmarking programme, and the feasibility of implementing it nationwide in Spain. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe MAPBM considers the three dimensions of a transformation effort (structure, process and outcomes) and grades these within a maturity scale matrix. Each dimension includes the various drivers of a PBM programme, and their corresponding measures and key performance indicators. The structure measures are qualitative, and obtained using a survey and structured self-assessment checklist. The key performance indicators for process and outcomes are quantitative, and based on clinical data from the hospitals' electronic medical records. Key performance indicators for process address major clinical recommendations in each PBM pillar, and are applied to six common procedures characterised by significant blood loss.

resultsIn its first 5 years, the MAPBM was deployed in 59 hospitals and used to analyse 181,826 hospital episodes, which proves the feasibility of implementing a sustainable model to measure and compare PBM clinical practice and outcomes across hospitals in Spain.

conclusionThe MAPBM initiative aims to become a useful tool for healthcare organisations to implement PBM programmes and improve patients' safety and outcomes.

Indexed as

Patient SafetyBlood PreservationBlood TransfusionHospital AdministrationHospitalsHumansSpainTransfusion Reaction

Identifiers

PMID32955422
PMCPMC8092037
OpenAlexW3087095380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.