Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32955196›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational gastroenterology2020

Predictors for Submucosal Fibrosis in Patients With Superficial Squamous Esophageal Neoplasia Undergoing Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.

Xiaoduan Zhuang, Ming Xu, Zhenyu Chen, Jianqi Wang, Kai Qian, Shihao Wang, Guoming Deng, Yang Bai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational gastroenterology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Mapping Two Decades of Research on Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Esophageal Cancer: A Bibliometric and Visual Analysis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Article
  3. Risk stratification for stricture formation after endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal dysplasia.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaoduan ZhuangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Zhujiang Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Ming XuDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Second People's Hospital of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, China.
Zhenyu ChenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jianqi WangDepartment of Otolaryngology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Kai QianDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Shihao WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Guoming DengDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yang BaiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Southern Medical University · CNGuangdong Provincial People's Hospital · CNNanfang Hospital · CNThird Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSubmucosal fibrosis greatly hinders the success of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). This study determined ESD outcomes in patients with esophageal submucosal fibrosis and further explored the predictors.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 163 patients with superficial squamous esophageal neoplasia. The degree of submucosal fibrosis was classified as follows: F0, none; F1, mild; and F2, severe. ESD outcomes as a function of the degree of submucosal fibrosis and biopsy were determined. The potential predictors of submucosal fibrosis were analyzed.

resultsEn bloc resection, R0 resection, and procedure time were significantly different between the F0-F2 groups (P = 0.009, P = 0.002, and P < 0.001, respectively). Perforation and immediate bleeding rates of F2 were significantly higher than the F0/F1 groups (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). However, the nonbiopsy group vs the biopsy group and the delayed ESD group (postbiopsy >21 days) vs the early ESD group (postbiopsy ≤21 days) showed no statistical differences regarding the en bloc resection, R0 resection, and ESD complications (all P > 0.05). Further analysis indicated that it was not the biopsy history and delayed ESD (both P > 0.05), rather submucosal invasion vs intramucosal tumor (odds ratio = 4.534, P = 0.003) and current smoker vs nonsmoker (odds ratio = 2.145, P = 0.043) were independent risk factors for endoscopic submucosal fibrosis. DISCUSSION: Esophageal submucosal fibrosis was shown to be closely related to unsatisfactory ESD outcomes. Biopsy history and delayed ESD had no adverse effect on submucosal fibrosis and ESD outcomes. Submucosal invasion and current cigarette smoking were predictors of submucosal fibrosis.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiopsyCarcinoma, Squamous CellEndoscopic Mucosal ResectionEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagusFemaleFibrosisHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsPrognosisRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID32955196
PMCPMC7410034
OpenAlexW3047926589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.