ArticleCardiovascular digital health journal
Discriminating electrocardiographic responses to His-bundle pacing using machine learning.
Article in Cardiovascular digital health journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Left bundle branch pacing in patients with structural heart disease: personalizing cardiac resynchronization therapy.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025Review
- Conduction system pacing: how far are we from the "electrical" bypass?Heart failure reviews · 2024Review
- Deep learning classification of capnography waveforms: secondary analysis of the PRODIGY study.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2023Article
- Artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram to distinguish cavotricuspid isthmus dependence from other atrial tachycardia mechanismsEuropean heart journal. Digital health · 2022Article
- Left ventricular activation time and pattern are preserved with both selective and nonselective His bundle pacing.Heart rhythm O2 · 2021Article
- Electrocardiographic predictors of successful resynchronization of left bundle branch block by His bundle pacing.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2021Article
- Effects of His bundle pacing and right ventricular apex pacing on cardiac electrical and mechanical synchrony and cardiac function in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
- His-Purkinje Conduction System Pacing: State of the Art in 2020.Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedErratum.2021
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHis-bundle pacing (HBP) has emerged as an alternative to conventional ventricular pacing because of its ability to deliver physiological ventricular activation. Pacing at the His bundle produces different electrocardiographic (ECG) responses: selective His-bundle pacing (S-HBP), non-selective His bundle pacing (NS-HBP), and myocardium-only capture (MOC). These 3 capture types must be distinguished from each other, which can be challenging and time-consuming even for experts.
objectiveThe purpose of this study was to use artificial intelligence (AI) in the form of supervised machine learning using a convolutional neural network (CNN) to automate HBP ECG interpretation.
methodsWe identified patients who had undergone HBP and extracted raw 12-lead ECG data during S-HBP, NS-HBP, and MOC. A CNN was trained, using 3-fold cross-validation, on 75% of the segmented QRS complexes labeled with their capture type. The remaining 25% was kept aside as a testing dataset.
resultsThe CNN was trained with 1297 QRS complexes from 59 patients. Cohen kappa for the neural network's performance on the 17-patient testing set was 0.59 (95% confidence interval 0.30 to 0.88;
conclusionWe demonstrated proof of concept that a neural network can be trained to automate discrimination between HBP ECG responses. When a larger dataset is trained to higher accuracy, automated AI ECG analysis could facilitate HBP implantation and follow-up and prevent complications resulting from incorrect HBP ECG analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.