Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32954280›Full record

ArticleBrain communications2020

Intraepidermal nerve fibre density as biomarker in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A.

Beate Hartmannsberger, Kathrin Doppler, Julia Stauber, Beate Schlotter-Weigel, Peter Young, Michael W Sereda, Claudia Sommer

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Brain communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Mechanisms and Treatments in Demyelinating CMT.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2021
    Review
  7. Studying human nociceptors: from fundamentals to clinic.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2021
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Beate HartmannsbergerDepartment of Neurology, University of Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.
Kathrin DopplerDepartment of Neurology, University of Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.
Julia StauberFriedrich-Baur-Institute, Department of Neurology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3198-7269
Beate Schlotter-WeigelFriedrich-Baur-Institute, Department of Neurology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany.
Peter YoungMedical Park Bad Feilnbach Reithofpark, Department of Neurology, 83075 Bad Feilnbach, Germany.
Michael W SeredaDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology, University Medical Center Göttingen (UMG), 37075 Göttingen, Germany.
Claudia SommerDepartment of Neurology, University of Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.
University of Würzburg · DEFriedrich Baur Stiftung · DEUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A, caused by a duplication of the gene

Indexed as

Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease type 1Aintraepidermal nerve fibre densityMerkel cell densityreproducible outcome measureskin punch biopsy

Identifiers

PMID32954280
PMCPMC7425304
OpenAlexW3005661552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.