Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32954227›Full record

ArticleACS applied bio materials2020

Osteoimmunomodulatory Effects of Enamel Matrix Derivate and Strontium Coating Layers: A Short- and Long-Term

Maryam Rahmati, Matthias Johannes Frank, Sebastian Martin Walter, Marta Cabrer Monjo, Maria Satué, Janne Elin Reseland, Ståle Petter Lyngstadaas, Håvard Jostein Haugen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS applied bio materials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Bone Grafts: Everything You Need to Know.Journal of periodontal research · 2026
    Review
  2. Sustained release of Sr and Ca from a micronanotopographic titanium surface improves osteoblast function.Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Maryam RahmatiDepartment of Biomaterials, Institute for Clinical Dentistry, University of Oslo, PO Box 1109 Blindern, NO-0317 Oslo, Norway.
Matthias Johannes FrankDepartment of Biomaterials, Institute for Clinical Dentistry, University of Oslo, PO Box 1109 Blindern, NO-0317 Oslo, Norway.
Sebastian Martin WalterDepartment of Biomaterials, Institute for Clinical Dentistry, University of Oslo, PO Box 1109 Blindern, NO-0317 Oslo, Norway.
Marta Cabrer MonjoDepartment of Fundamental Biology and Health Sciences, Research Institute on Health Sciences (IUNICS), University of Balearic Islands, ES-07122 Palma, Spain.
Maria SatuéDepartment of Fundamental Biology and Health Sciences, Research Institute on Health Sciences (IUNICS), University of Balearic Islands, ES-07122 Palma, Spain.
Janne Elin ReselandDepartment of Biomaterials, Institute for Clinical Dentistry, University of Oslo, PO Box 1109 Blindern, NO-0317 Oslo, Norway.
Ståle Petter LyngstadaasDepartment of Biomaterials, Institute for Clinical Dentistry, University of Oslo, PO Box 1109 Blindern, NO-0317 Oslo, Norway.
Håvard Jostein HaugenDepartment of Biomaterials, Institute for Clinical Dentistry, University of Oslo, PO Box 1109 Blindern, NO-0317 Oslo, Norway.
University of Oslo · NOHealth Research Institute of the Balearic Islands · ESUniversity of Veterinary Medicine Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past few years, surface modification of implant surfaces has gained substantial attention as a promising solution to avoid the failure of biomaterials after implantation. Although researchers suggest several strategies for surface functionalization of titanium-based implants, only a few studies have compared the osteoimmunomodulatory effects of ionic nanostructures and biofunctionalization in the same biological model. Enamel matrix derivate (EMD) and strontium are both known for their positive influences on bone cell responses. In this study, we functionalized the titanium-zirconium implant surface with EMD and strontium using an electrochemical cathodic polarization method. Afterward, we evaluated the osteoimmunomodulatory effects of EMD or strontium coated titanium-zirconium implants in the tibia of eight Gray Bastard Chinchilla rabbits. We performed 2 and 3D micro-CT, wound fluid, histologic, and histomorphometric analyses on bone tissues after 4- and 8-weeks of implantation. Although the results could indicate some differences between groups regarding the bone quality, there was no difference in bone amount or volume. EMD stimulated higher ALP activity and lower cytotoxicity in wound fluid, as well as a lower expression of inflammatory markers after 8 weeks indicating its osteoimmunomodulatory effects after implantation. Overall, the results suggested that ionic nanostructure modification and biofunctionalization might be useful in regulating the immune responses to implants.

Identifiers

PMID32954227
PMCPMC7493216
OpenAlexW3044351926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.