ArticleBioactive materials2021
The effect of carbon nanotubes on osteogenic functions of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells
Article in Bioactive materials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tailoring bone microenvironment with 2D layered materials.Fundamental research · 2025Review
- Understanding Matrix Stiffness in Vinyl Polymer Hydrogels: Implications in Bone Tissue Engineering.ACS omega · 2024Article
- In Vivo Evaluation of Regenerative Osteogenic Potential Using a Human Demineralized Dentin Matrix for Dental Application.Dentistry journal · 2024Article
- Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Laden Nanocomposite Scaffolds Enhance Bone Regeneration in Rabbit Critical-Size Segmental Bone Defect Model.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024Article
- Graphene: A Multifaceted Carbon-Based Material for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications.ACS omega · 2024Review
- Research advances of nanomaterials for the acceleration of fracture healing.Bioactive materials · 2024Review
- Prevention strategies of postoperative adhesion in soft tissues by applying biomaterials: Based on the mechanisms of occurrence and development of adhesions.Bioactive materials · 2023Review
- Review of the Role of Nanotechnology in Overcoming the Challenges Faced in Oral Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Electrospun Fibrous Silica for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- Commercial dishes with gelatin-free microstructured inserts for elongated stem cell self-renewal and pluripotency.iScience · 2023Article
- Nano-Hydroxyapatite Composite Scaffolds Loaded with Bioactive Factors and Drugs for Bone Tissue Engineering.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- A non-invasive smart scaffold for bone repair and monitoring.Bioactive materials · 2023Article
- 3D printed-electrospun PCL/hydroxyapatite/MWCNTs scaffolds for the repair of subchondral bone.Regenerative biomaterials · 2023Article
- Inorganic Nanoparticles-Based Systems in Biomedical Applications of Stem Cells: Opportunities and Challenges.International journal of nanomedicine · 2023Review
- Injectable decellularized cartilage matrix hydrogel encapsulating urine-derived stem cells for immunomodulatory and cartilage defect regeneration.NPJ Regenerative medicine · 2022Article
- Mesoporous Silica Promotes Osteogenesis of Human Adipose-Derived Stem Cells Identified by a High-Throughput Microfluidic Chip Assay.Pharmaceutics · 2022Article
- Recent advances in biofunctional guided bone regeneration materials for repairing defective alveolar and maxillofacial bone: A review.The Japanese dental science review · 2022Review
- Effects of Antibacterial Co-Cr-Mo-Cu Alloys on Osteoblast Proliferation, Differentiation, and the Inhibition of Apoptosis.Orthopaedic surgery · 2022Article
- The Ability and Mechanism of nHAC/CGF in Promoting Osteogenesis and Repairing Mandibular Defects.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Functionalized multidimensional biomaterials for bone microenvironment engineering applications: Focus on osteoimmunomodulation.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It has been well recognized that the development and use of artificial materials with high osteogenic ability is one of the most promising means to replace bone grafting that has exhibited various negative effects. The biomimetic features and unique physiochemical properties of nanomaterials play important roles in stimulating cellular functions and guiding tissue regeneration. But efficacy degree of some nanomaterials to promote specific tissue formation is still not clear. We hereby comparatively studied the osteogenic ability of our treated multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MCNTs) and the main inorganic mineral component of natural bone, nano-hydroxyapatite (nHA) in the same system, and tried to tell the related mechanism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.