Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32953881›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2020

Coexpression Network Analysis Identifies a Novel Nine-RNA Signature to Improve Prognostic Prediction for Prostate Cancer Patients.

Jiarong Cai, Zheng Chen, Xuelian Chen, He Huang, Xia Lin, Bin Miao

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Long non-coding RNA MAGI2Journal of Cancer · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jiarong Cai *Department of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510630, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0208-7942
Zheng Chen *Department of Stomatology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510630, China.
Xuelian ChenDepartment of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510630, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3850-8363
He HuangGeneral Surgery Department, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510630, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3055-5942
Xia LinDepartment of Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510630, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1925-8154
Bin MiaoDepartment of Organ Transplantation, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510630, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6375-5281
Sun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProstate cancer (PCa) is the most common malignancy and the leading cause of cancer death in men. Recent studies suggest the molecular signature was more effective than the clinical indicators for the prognostic prediction, but all of the known studies focused on a single RNA type. The present study was to develop a new prognostic signature by integrating long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) and messenger RNAs (mRNAs) and evaluate its prognostic performance.

methodsThe RNA expression data of PCa patients were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) or Gene Expression Omnibus database (GSE17951, GSE7076, and GSE16560). The PCa-driven modules were identified by constructing a weighted gene coexpression network, the corresponding genes of which were overlapped with differentially expressed RNAs (DERs) screened by the MetaDE package. The optimal prognostic signature was screened using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator analysis. The prognostic performance and functions of the combined prognostic signature was then assessed.

resultsTwelve PCa-driven modules were identified using TCGA dataset and validated in the GSE17951 and GSE7076 datasets, and six of them were considered to be preserved. A total of 217 genes in these 6 modules were overlapped with 699 DERs, from which a nine-gene prognostic signature was identified (including 3 lncRNAs and 6 mRNAs), and the risk score of each patient was calculated. The overall survival was significantly shortened in patients having the risk score higher than the cut-off, which was demonstrated in TCGA (

conclusionThe risk score system established in this study may provide a novel reliable method to identify PCa patients at a high risk of death.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene Regulatory NetworksHumansMalePrognosisProstatic NeoplasmsRNA, Long NoncodingRNA, MessengerROC CurveBiomarkers, TumorRNA, Long NoncodingRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID32953881
PMCPMC7482004
OpenAlexW3082814016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.