Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32953846›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of clinical cases2020

Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy in the follow up of neuroendocrine neoplasms of appendix.

Jelena Saponjski, Djuro Macut, Dragana Sobic-Saranovic, Sanja Ognjanovic, Ivana Bozic Antic, Djordje Pavlovic, Vera Artiko

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of clinical cases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Neuroendocrine tumors of the appendix: a comprehensive review of the literature and case presentation.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jelena SaponjskiCenter for Nuclear Medicine, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade 11000, Serbia.
Djuro MacutClinic for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, Clinical Center of Serbia, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade 11000, Serbia.
Dragana Sobic-SaranovicCenter for Nuclear Medicine Clinical Center of Serbia, Faculty of Medicine University of Belgrade, Belgrade 11000, Serbia.
Sanja OgnjanovicClinic for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, Clinical Center of Serbia, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade 11000, Serbia.
Ivana Bozic AnticClinic for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, Clinical Center of Serbia, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade 11000, Serbia.
Djordje PavlovicUniversity Children's Clinic, Belgrade 11000, Serbia.
Vera ArtikoCenter for Nuclear Medicine Clinical Center of Serbia, Faculty of Medicine University of Belgrade, Belgrade 11000, Serbia. vera.artiko@gmail.com.
University of Belgrade · RSCentar za Promociju Nauke · RSUniversity Children's Hospital, Belgrade · RS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeuroendocrine tumors of appendix (ANETs) known as carcinoids, are rare endocrine neoplasms originated from enterochromaffin cells of gastrointestinal tract. ANETs are the third most frequent (16.7%) gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors, with the incidence of 0.08-0.2 cases/100000 during one year. Incidental ANETs occur in 0.2%-0.7% of emergency surgical resections because of suspected appendicitis which is usually the first manifestation of ANET. Although there are a lot of papers about application of somatostatin receptor scintigraphy in gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors, there are very rare sporadic cases described about ANETs particularly.

aimTo establish the role of somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) in the management of patients with neuroendocrine tumors of appendix (ANET).

methodsThe total of 35 patients was investigated, 23 females and 12 males, average age (43.7 ± 17.3 years). All patients had histological diagnosis of ANET (34 carcinoids of appendix and one tubular carcinoid). Majority of tumors have been found incidentally during surgery of: Acute appendicitis (

resultsThere were 12 true positive (TP), 19 true negative, 3 false positive and 1 false negative SRS result. Sensitivity of the method was 92.31%, specificity was 86.36%, positive predictive value was 80.00%, negative predictive value was 95.00% and accuracy 88.57%. Receiver operating characteristics analysis showed that SRS scintigraphy is a good test for detection TP cases [area under the curve of 0.850, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.710-0.990,

conclusionIn conclusion, our results confirmed the value of SRS in the follow-up of the patients with ANET after surgery, if recurrences or metastases are suspected.

Indexed as

AppendixCarcinoidFollow upNuclear medicineRadionuclideSomatostatin receptor scintigraphy

Identifiers

PMID32953846
PMCPMC7479554
OpenAlexW3083619351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.