ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2020
Evaluation of the updated "
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Overview of Risk Factors and Diagnosis of Invasive Candidiasis.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Retrospective analysis of the epidemiological characteristics, risk factors, survival rate, and drug resistance of candidemia and construction of a logistic regression prediction model (2013-2024).BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- French intensive care physicians' practices for the management of high-risk patients with invasive candidiasis: results from the multicenter INSPIRE survey.Annals of intensive care · 2026Article
- The accuracy of the Candida ScoreAnnals of medicine · 2025Article
- Evaluating antimicrobial stewardship strategies in candidemia: a novel desirability of outcome ranking (DOOR) analysis comparing blood culture versus T2Candida diagnostic approaches.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2025Observational
- Effect of octreotide combined with ulinastatin on the creatinine-to-albumin ratio and systemic immune-inflammation index in patients with severe acute pancreatitis.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Evaluation of theQatar medical journal · 2025Article
- Establishment and Validation of a Machine-Learning Prediction Nomogram Based on Lymphocyte Subtyping for Intra-Abdominal Candidiasis in Septic Patients.Clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Fever and infections in surgical intensive care: an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Critical Care Committee clinical consensus document.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2024Article
- Nanopore-targeted sequencing for simultaneous diagnosis of suspected sepsis and early targeted therapy.Annals of translational medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe
methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis on a single center public database. All patients with ICU stay ≥72 hours were included in this study. The
resultsA total of 17,666 patients were identified after screening 58,976 hospital admissions, and 436 cases (2.5%) were diagnosed with invasive candidiasis. In the infection group, the number of patients who met the Sepsis 3.0 criteria was greater than the number of patients with severe sepsis (81.2%
conclusionsOur study confirmed the clinical relevance and comparative superiority of the updated
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.