Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32953628›Full record

ReviewGland surgery2020

Laparotomy

Stefano Uccella, Massimo P Franchi, Stefano Cianci, Pier Carlo Zorzato, Francesca Bertoli, Salvatore Gueli Alletti, Fabio Ghezzi, Giovanni Scambia

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Gland surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Stefano UccellaDivision of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Maternal, Neonatal and Infant Health, ASL Biella, Italy.
Massimo P FranchiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Stefano CianciDepartment of Woman Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Pier Carlo ZorzatoDivision of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Maternal, Neonatal and Infant Health, ASL Biella, Italy.
Francesca BertoliDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Insubria, F. Del Ponte Hospital, Varese, Italy.
Salvatore Gueli AllettiFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, UOC di Ginecologia Oncologica, Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy.
Fabio GhezziDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Insubria, F. Del Ponte Hospital, Varese, Italy.
Giovanni ScambiaFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, UOC di Ginecologia Oncologica, Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy.
University of Insubria · ITUniversity of Verona · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITOspedale degli Infermi · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of the present review is to thoroughly investigate the role of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in the setting of secondary cytoreduction for ovarian cancer recurrence, comparing this approach to traditional open surgery. PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, Scopus and Web of Science databases (between 1st January 1989 and 1st January 2020), have been systematically queried to identify all articles reporting either laparoscopic or robotic-assisted secondary surgical cytoreduction for recurrent ovarian cancer. We also manually searched the reference lists of the identified studies. Only English language papers were considered. Two independent reviewers screened and identified the reports. A sub-analysis was performed including studies comparing MIS

Indexed as

laparoscopyminimally invasive surgery (MIS)open surgeryOvarian cancerrelapserobotics

Identifiers

PMID32953628
PMCPMC7475354
OpenAlexW3047476671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.