Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32953627›Full record

ReviewGland surgery2020

Secondary and tertiary ovarian cancer recurrence: what is the best management?

Simone Garzon, Antonio Simone Laganà, Jvan Casarin, Ricciarda Raffaelli, Antonella Cromi, Massimo Franchi, Fabio Barra, Ibrahim Alkatout, Simone Ferrero, Fabio Ghezzi

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gland surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Ovarian cancer.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Simone GarzonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Filippo Del Ponte" Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Antonio Simone LaganàDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Filippo Del Ponte" Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Jvan CasarinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Filippo Del Ponte" Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Ricciarda RaffaelliDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AOUI Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Antonella CromiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Filippo Del Ponte" Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Massimo FranchiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AOUI Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Fabio BarraAcademic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
Ibrahim AlkatoutKiel School of Gynecological Endoscopy, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Simone FerreroAcademic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
Fabio GhezziDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Filippo Del Ponte" Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Ospedale Filippo Del Ponte Varese · ITUniversity of Verona · ITOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITUniversity of Genoa · ITUniversity of Lübeck · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ovarian cancer with complete clinical response recurs with a high rate. Recurrence is observed in almost 25% of cases with early-stage diseases and in more than 80% with more advance stages. Based on a platinum-free interval cut-off of 6 months, the first recurrence is usually classified in platinum-sensitive versus platinum-resistant, reflecting the biological characteristics underlying the clinical behavior. After this first recurrence, the patients are rarely cured, but second-line therapy can provide significant clinical responses, particularly in first platinum-sensitive recurrence. The approach to secondary and tertiary recurrence follows the same general principles applied in the first recurrence. Platinum-sensitivity based on the treatment-free interval defines the available chemotherapeutic regimens, whit less therapeutic options and a generally worse prognosis in platinum-resistant recurrent disease. Nevertheless, in this scenario, the introduction of new targeted therapies changed the prognosis of patients with both platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant recurrence. The first introduced antiangiogenic therapy resulted able to improve prognosis in recurrent disease both as a single-agent and combined therapy, although the growing adoption in the first line therapy requires further investigation to prove their efficacy after repeated use. More recently, the approach to secondary, tertiary, and later recurrence has been changed by the introduction of PARP inhibitors, which resulted effective as maintenance monotherapy in both platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant recurrence when the genetic background of the tumor allows their application with a significant improvement of oncological outcomes. Overall, although the growing body of promising therapeutic options to approach recurrent ovarian cancer, all the available evidence suggests that the best unique management of secondary and tertiary recurrence does not exist but should be personalized based on the disease characteristics, previous treatments, patient characteristics, and patient preference. On that basis, in this review, we report a general and complete overview of the approach at the secondary and tertiary ovarian cancer recurrence with the aim to provide a wide vision on the multiple available therapeutic options.

Indexed as

bevacizumabOvarian cancerPARP inhibitorsplatinum-based chemotherapyrecurrence

Identifiers

PMID32953627
PMCPMC7475365
OpenAlexW3027288224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.