ArticleGland surgery2020
Standard-dose epirubicin increases the pathological complete response rate in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.
Article in Gland surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring the effectiveness of molecular subtypes, biomarkers, and genetic variations as first-line treatment predictors in Asian breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy of Moxibustion for Cancer-Related Fatigue in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Integrative cancer therapiesPooled it
- Nanoparticles synthesis, properties and promising devices for drug delivery systems: a review.Discover nano · 2026Review
- In Silico Evaluation of Some Computer-Designed Fluoroquinolone-Glutamic Acid Hybrids as Potential Topoisomerase II Inhibitors with Anti-Cancer Effect.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNeoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has become the best comprehensive treatment choice for breast cancer. Epirubicin is a crucial drug widely used in breast cancer chemotherapy, but it is often used with a reduced dosage in NAC for Chinese patients for its notable cardiotoxicity and frequent adverse events. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of standard-dose epirubicin in NAC for Chinese breast cancer patients retrospectively.
methodsWe retrospectively collected clinicopathological parameters of breast cancer patients who underwent epirubicin-based NAC and a later surgery from three separate medical centers. Patients were divided into standard-dose and low-dose groups according to the epirubicin dose. The pathological complete response (pCR) rate, as the main therapeutic outcomes, and the incidence of adverse events were recorded and compared.
resultsThe pCR rate of the standard-dose group was 41.2%, while the low-dose group was 10.1% (P<0.001). The univariate analysis showed that ER status (HR, 2.519; 95% CI, 1.057-5.988, P=0.037) and epirubicin dose (HR, 6.200; 95% CI, 2.374-16.193, P<0.001) were associated with pCR rates. The multivariate analysis showed that patients receiving standard-dose epirubicin chemotherapy (HR, 6.925; 95% CI, 2.537-18.902, P<0.001) showed more possibility to achieve pCR after NAC. There was no significant difference in the incidence rates of grade III/IV adverse events between these two different dose groups.
conclusionsStandard-dose epirubicin increases the pCR rate in breast cancer patients treated with NAC, and no other toxicity is noted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.