Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32953607›Full record

ArticleGland surgery2020

The effectiveness, risks and improvement of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy during the learning curve: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Long Huang, Yifeng Tian, Jiayi Wu, Maolin Yan, Funan Qiu, Songqiang Zhou, Yannan Bai, Zhide Lai, Yaodong Wang, Shi Chen

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gland surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Long HuangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Yifeng TianDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Jiayi WuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Maolin YanDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Funan QiuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Songqiang ZhouDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Yannan BaiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Zhide LaiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Yaodong WangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Shi ChenDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Fujian Provincial Hospital · CNFujian Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPropensity score-matched analyses comparing the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) to open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) that consider the effect of the learning curve for LPD are lacking. We use Propensity score-matched to compare the safety and efficacy of LPD during the learning curve to OPD.

methodsThe medical records of 296 consecutive patients who had undergone LPD or OPD between September 2016 and August 2019 at Fujian Provincial Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Patients treated with LPD were matched 1:1 to those treated with OPD. Calculation of propensity scores considered age, gender, body mass index (BMI), tumor location, pathology, incidence of obstructive jaundice, incidence of biliary drainage, pancreatic texture, pancreatic duct diameter, previous abdominal surgery, comorbidities, and case distribution of the surgical team.

resultsAfter propensity score matching, 196 patients were divided into two groups: 98 patients in the LPD group and 98 patients in the OPD group. LPD performed during the learning curve was associated with a longer median operative time (OT) (432

conclusionsOT, incidence of major surgery-associated complications, and LOS were significantly increased in patients that underwent LPD, but were significantly improved during the learning curve. Elderly patients and patients with a non-dialated MPD should not be treated with LPD performed by inexperienced surgeons.

Indexed as

efficacyLaparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD)learning curveopen pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD)safety profile

Identifiers

PMID32953607
PMCPMC7475375
OpenAlexW3047211711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.