ReviewTranslational lung cancer research2020
Accuracy of lung cancer staging in the multidisciplinary team setting.
Review in Translational lung cancer research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of Multidisciplinary Team Care on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients with Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Pooled it
- [Current Status of Multidisciplinary Team Consultation for Lung Cancer and Prospects under the Empowerment of Medical Large Models].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2026Review
- Clinical Versus Pathologic Staging in Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Assessed by an Established Lung Cancer Multidisciplinary Meeting.Thoracic cancer · 2026Article
- Clinical efficacy ofFrontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- The Impact of Multidisciplinary Team Meetings on the Survival of Stage IV NSCLC Patients.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Impact of Technical Standardization on Pneumothorax and Chest Tube Insertion Rates: A Retrospective Learning Curve Analysis of CT-Guided Lung Biopsies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Curative-Intention Surgery with Lobe-Specific Versus Systematic Lymph Node Dissection in Clinical Stage IA-IB Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Our Experience and Literature Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- MicroRNAs: circulating biomarkers for the early detection of imperceptible cancers via biosensor and machine-learning advances.Oncogene · 2024Review
- A Review of Endobronchial-Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Intranodal Forceps Biopsy and Cryobiopsy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Factors affecting accuracy of clinical staging in resectable non-small cell lung cancer in a real-world study.Thoracic cancer · 2024Article
- Evaluating peritumoral and intratumoral radiomics signatures for predicting lymph node metastasis in surgically resectable non-small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- The Best Supportive Care in Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Review
- A rare case of sarcoid myelitis complicating Löfgren's syndrome.Sarcoidosis, vasculitis, and diffuse lung diseases : official journal of WASOG · 2023Article
- Assessment of Barriers and Challenges to Screening, Diagnosis, and Biomarker Testing in Early-Stage Lung Cancer.Cancers · 2023Review
- Article
- The Impact of Multidisciplinary Team Meetings on Patient Management in Oncologic Thoracic Surgery: A Single-Center Experience.Cancers · 2021Article
- Using Convoluted Neural Networks in Diagnosing Lung Cancer on Computed Tomography Scans.Current health sciences journalArticle
- Diagnosis of lung cancer by flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy: a descriptive study.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologieArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate staging of lung cancer is of utmost importance in determining the stage-appropriate treatment and prognosis. Imaging tests which include contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) examination of the chest to include the liver and adrenal glands and 18-fluoro-2 deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET)/CT scan facilitate the initial tumor node metastasis (TNM) staging of the disease and provide guidance on the optimal biopsy site and biopsy method. The diagnostic and staging approach should be tailored to the individual patient according to risk, benefit, patient preferences, and available expertise. Diagnosis and staging should preferably be accomplished with a single procedure or the least number of invasive procedures if more than one is needed. Ideally, centers managing lung cancer patients should have a multidisciplinary thoracic oncology board prescribing personalized evidence-based management tailored to each individual patient. Multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings provide a platform for key experts from various disciplines to contribute specific advice on the management of each individual patient. As assessment of mediastinal lymph node involvement is an important component of lung cancer staging, optimal mediastinal staging can be achieved with a variety of techniques that can be discussed and performed by the various specialists in the MDT. Despite a relative paucity of quality evidence that MDT contributes to improvements in lung cancer survival outcomes, this approach has evolved to become the standard of care in many centers around the world. Thoracic MDT has resulted in more focused and timely investigations for histopathologic diagnosis and disease staging which translate into earlier treatment initiation. Moreover, there is increasing evidence that MDT care facilitates and allows access to investigations that lead to improved accuracy of tumor and nodal staging. However, there is still a paucity of evidence on the accuracy of lung cancer staging in the MDT setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.