Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32953508›Full record

ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2020

Hazard ratio of progression-free survival is an excellent predictor of overall survival in phase III randomized controlled trials evaluating the first-line chemotherapy for extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer.

Hao Chen, Nobuyuki Horita, Kentaro Ito, Yu Hara, Nobuaki Kobayashi, Takeshi Kaneko

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hao ChenDepartment of Pulmonology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Nobuyuki HoritaDepartment of Pulmonology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Kentaro ItoRespiratory Center, Matsusaka Municipal Hospital, Matsusaka, Japan.
Yu HaraDepartment of Pulmonology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Nobuaki KobayashiDepartment of Pulmonology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Takeshi KanekoDepartment of Pulmonology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Yokohama City University · JPSoka Municipal Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhether hazard ratio (HR) of progression-free survival (HRpfs), odds ratio (OR) of response rate (ORrr), OR of disease control rate (ORdcr), and OR of 1-year overall survival (ORos1y) used for extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC) correlate with HR of overall survival (HRos) at a randomized-trial level, especially for a trial that evaluates molecular-targeted therapy (MTT) or immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), is unclear.

methodsWe included an individually randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing two regimens as the first-line treatment for chemo-naive ED-SCLC, which have been reported in English-language since 2000. A weighted Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (r) was evaluated.

resultsWe finally found 42 eligible articles consisted of 11,478 cases. Estimated r with HRos were as followings: HRpfs (29 trial, 8,573 cases, r=0.87), ORrr (39 trials, 11,030 cases, r=0.47), ORdcr (29 trials, 7,799 cases, r=0.48), and ORos1y (40 trials, 11,250 cases, r=0.69). Phase III subgroup (16 trials, 7,079 cases) yielded an excellent r between HRpfs and HRos of 0.96. ORdcr presented the best correlation with HRos for phase II trial subgroup (r=-0.64); however, this result was mainly calculated from MTT trials. HRpfs may overestimate the efficacy of MMT in a phase II trial. ORrr and ORdcr might undervalue the efficacy of ICI even in a phase III trial.

conclusionsHRpfs can be a good surrogate of HRos, especially in a phase III trial. Depending on a single outcome in a randomized phase II trial may result in unneeded phase III trial or inappropriate abandonment of the regimen.

Indexed as

molecular targeted therapySmall-cell lung carcinomasurvivaltreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID32953508
PMCPMC7481618
OpenAlexW3046847556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.