Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32953507›Full record

ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2020

Li Li, Wei Zhao, Xiaorong Sun, Ning Liu, Yue Zhou, Xiaohui Luan, Song Gao, Shuqiang Zhao, Jinming Yu, Shuanghu Yuan

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. The lung cancers: staging and response, CT,The British journal of radiology · 2023
    Review
  4. Review
  5. The current status and future prospects for molecular imaging-guided precision surgery.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Negative Correlation BetweenFrontiers in endocrinology · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Li LiShandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.
Wei ZhaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.
Xiaorong SunDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.
Ning LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.
Yue ZhouDepartment of Oncology, Shanghe People's Hospital, Jinan, China.
Xiaohui LuanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Dezhou People's Hospital, Dezhou, China.
Song GaoDepartment of Oncology, Jining Infectious Diseases Hospital, Jining, China.
Shuqiang ZhaoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.
Jinming YuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.
Shuanghu YuanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.
Shandong First Medical University · CNShandong Tumor Hospital · CNDezhou University · CNJinan Infectious Disease Hospital · CNShangqiu First People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe objective of this study was to explore the benefit of

methodsSeventy-two patients with NSCLC (37 cases of adenocarcinoma and 35 cases of squamous carcinoma) were enrolled to receive

resultsSignificant differences in ATV and TLA were observed among T1, T2, T3 and T4 cases (ATV, P=0.000; TLA, P=0.000). ATV and TLA also differed significantly among cases of clinical stage I, II, III and IV (ATV, P=0.002; TLA, P=0.011). However, no significant differences in any values were observed between stage III and IV NSCLC cases (SUV

Indexed as

18F-RGD PET/CTangiogenesischaracteristicsnon-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Identifiers

PMID32953507
PMCPMC7481644
OpenAlexW3046186757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.