Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32953487›Full record

ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2020

EGFR circulating tumour DNA testing: identification of predictors of ctDNA detection and implications for survival outcomes.

Alexandra Pender, Curtis Hughesman, Elaine Law, Amadea Kristanti, Kelly McNeil, Selina Wong, Tracy Tucker, Ian Bosdet, Sean Young, Janessa Laskin and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Alexandra PenderDepartment of Medical Oncology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust and North Middlesex University Hospital, London, UK.
Curtis HughesmanCancer Genetics & Genomics Laboratory, BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada.
Elaine LawCancer Genetics & Genomics Laboratory, BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada.
Amadea KristantiCancer Genetics & Genomics Laboratory, BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada.
Kelly McNeilCancer Genetics & Genomics Laboratory, BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada.
Selina WongDepartment of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada.
Tracy TuckerCancer Genetics & Genomics Laboratory, BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada.
Ian BosdetCancer Genetics & Genomics Laboratory, BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada.
Sean YoungCancer Genetics & Genomics Laboratory, BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada.
Janessa LaskinDepartment of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada.
Aly KarsanUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Stephen YipCancer Genetics & Genomics Laboratory, BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada.
Cheryl HoDepartment of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEGFR T790M testing is the standard of care for activating EGFR mutation (EGFRm) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) progressing on 1st/2nd generation TKIs to select patients for osimertinib. Despite sensitive assays, detection of circulating tumour deoxyribonucleic acid (ctDNA) is variable and influenced by clinical factors. The number and location of sites of progressive disease at time of testing were reviewed to explore the effect on EGFR ctDNA detection. The prognostic value of EGFR ctDNA detection on survival outcomes was assessed.

methodsFollowing extraction of cell-free DNA from plasma using the QIAamp Circulating Nucleic Acid Kit, custom droplet digital polymerase chair reaction (ddPCR) assays were used to assess EGFR ctDNA using the Bio-Rad QX200 system. The ddPCR assay has a limit of detection of ≤0.15% variant allele fraction. Baseline characteristics and imaging reports at time of EGFR ctDNA testing were reviewed retrospectively for a 1 year period.

resultsThe study included 177 patients who had an EGFR ctDNA test. Liver (aOR 3.13) or bone (aOR 2.76) progression or 3-5 sites of progression (aOR 2.22) were predictive of EGFR ctDNA detection. The median OS from first ctDNA test after multiple testing iterations was 12.3 m undetectable EGFR ctDNA, 7.6 m for original EGFR mutation only and 24.1 m with T790M (P=0.001).

conclusionsPatients with liver or bone progression and 3-5 progressing sites are more likely to have informative EGFR ctDNA testing. Detection of EGFR ctDNA is a negative prognostic indicator in the absence of a T790M resistance mutation, potentially reflecting the disease burden in the absence of targeted therapy options.

Indexed as

circulating tumour deoxyribonucleic acid (ctDNA)droplet digital polymerase chair reaction (ddPCR)Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)predictiveprognostic

Identifiers

PMID32953487
PMCPMC7481591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.