Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32953426›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2020

Postcard reminders for HPV vaccination mainly primed parents for providers' recommendations.

Stephanie A S Staras, Susan T Vadaparampil, Lindsay A Thompson, Courtney Scherr, Matthew J Gurka, Stephanie L Filipp, Elizabeth A Shenkman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stephanie A S StarasDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, 2004 Mowry Road, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.
Susan T VadaparampilHealth Outcomes and Behavior Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Moffitt Cancer Center Magnolia Campus, 12902 USF Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
Lindsay A ThompsonDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, 2004 Mowry Road, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.
Courtney ScherrHealth Outcomes and Behavior Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Moffitt Cancer Center Magnolia Campus, 12902 USF Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
Matthew J GurkaDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, 2004 Mowry Road, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.
Stephanie L FilippDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, 2004 Mowry Road, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.
Elizabeth A ShenkmanDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, 2004 Mowry Road, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parent-targeted reminders increase human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination rates. Our postcard reminders increased HPV vaccine initiation (receipt of at least one dose) by 60% among girls, but not substantially among boys. To select a complementary intervention that would maximize the effect of reminders, we assessed the percentage increase in HPV vaccine initiation from reminders increasing preventive care visits or increasing the likelihood of vaccine receipt during preventive care. We conducted a secondary analysis of the postcard reminders from a quasi-experimental, factorial designed, feasibility trial conducted in 2013-2014 among 2,470 11- to 17-year-old girls enrolled in Florida's Medicaid or Children's Health Insurance Programs. We used log-linear models and a 4-way decomposition method to estimate the mediating and interacting effects of preventive visits on the effect of postcards on HPV vaccination. After receiving a preventive visit, 76% (269/356) of girls remained unvaccinated. Nearly half of the effect of postcards on HPV vaccination was mediated by preventive visits (44%; 95% CI = 9.2% to 78.0%). Postcards increased HPV vaccine initiation mainly by increasing the likelihood of HPV vaccine receipt during preventive visits (pure indirect effect = 32.3%; 95% CI = 1.5% to 63.1%), and also by increasing the occurrence of preventive visits (mediated interaction = 11.3%; 95% CI = 1.5 to 21.1). Reminders likely increased vaccination rates during well visits by priming parents for HPV vaccine conversations with their child's health care provider. Thus, reminder effectiveness may be increased if timed closely to preventive care visits and/or combined with interventions that improve provider recommendations.

Indexed as

CHIP, Children's Health Insurance ProgramHPV, Human papillomavirusHuman papillomavirusLV, Learner VerificationPreventative careProvider recommendationReminderVaccine

Identifiers

PMID32953426
PMCPMC7486613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.