ReviewCurrent pollution reports2020
Making Waves Perspectives of Modelling and Monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 in Aquatic Environment for COVID-19 Pandemic.
Review in Current pollution reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Environmental monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 in the metropolitan area of Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul (RS), Brazil.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2024Article
- Comparison of pretrained transformer-based models for influenza and COVID-19 detection using social media text data in Saskatchewan, Canada.Frontiers in digital health · 2023Article
- Spectrum of environmental surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 fragments: Questions, quests, and conquest.Current opinion in environmental science & health · 2022Review
- Can infectious modelling be applicable globally - lessons from COVID 19.Current opinion in environmental science & health · 2022Review
- An opinion on Wastewater-Based Epidemiological Monitoring (WBEM) with Clinical Diagnostic Test (CDT) for detecting high-prevalence areas of community COVID-19 Infections.Current opinion in environmental science & health · 2022Review
- Indirect effects of COVID-19 on the environment: How deep and how long?The Science of the total environment · 2022Article
- First comparison of conventional activated sludge versus root-zone treatment for SARS-CoV-2 RNA removal from wastewaters: Statistical and temporal significance.Chemical engineering journal (Lausanne, Switzerland : 1996) · 2021Article
- The impact of coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) in water: potential risks.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Review
- SARS-CoV-2 and other viruses in soil: An environmental outlook.Environmental research · 2021Review
- First detection of SARS-CoV-2 genetic material in the vicinity of COVID-19 isolation Centre in Bangladesh: Variation along the sewer network.The Science of the total environment · 2021Article
- Coalescence of co-infection and antimicrobial resistance with SARS-CoV-2 infection: The blues of post-COVID-19 world.Case studies in chemical and environmental engineering · 2021Article
- Novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: From transmission to control with an interdisciplinary vision.Environmental research · 2021Review
- High-throughput molecular analyses of microbiomes as a tool to monitor the wellbeing of aquatic environments.Microbial biotechnology · 2021Review
- The novel SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: Possible environmental transmission, detection, persistence and fate during wastewater and water treatment.The Science of the total environment · 2021Review
- A chronicle of SARS-CoV-2: Seasonality, environmental fate, transport, inactivation, and antiviral drug resistance.Journal of hazardous materials · 2021Review
- Decay of SARS-CoV-2 RNA along the wastewater treatment outfitted with Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) system evaluated through two sample concentration techniques.The Science of the total environment · 2021Article
- Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in Communities Through Wastewater Surveillance-a Potential Approach for Estimation of Disease Burden.Current pollution reports · 2021Review
- Frontier review on the propensity and repercussion of SARS-CoV-2 migration to aquatic environment.Journal of hazardous materials letters · 2020Article
- Persistence, transmission, and infectivity of SARS-CoV-2 in inanimate environments.Case studies in chemical and environmental engineering · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in the aquatic environment pertaining to the COVID-19 pandemic has been a global concern. Though SARS-CoV-2 is known as a respiratory virus, its detection in faecal matter and wastewater demonstrates its enteric involvement resulting in vulnerable aquatic environment. Here, we provide the latest updates on wastewater-based epidemiology, which is gaining interest in the current situation as a unique tool of surveillance and monitoring of the disease. Transport pathways with its migration through wastewater to surface and subsurface waters, probability of infectivity and ways of inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 are discussed in detail. Epidemiological models, especially compartmental projections, have been explained with an emphasis on its limitation and the assumptions on which the future predictions of disease propagation are based. Besides, this review covers various predictive models to track and project disease spread in the future and gives an insight into the probability of a future outbreak of the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.