Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32953388›Full record

ArticleCurrent treatment options in allergy2015

Peptide Immunotherapy; short but long lasting?

Elizabeth J Simms, Ijlal Syed, Christopher Rudulier, Mark Larché

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current treatment options in allergy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Mechanism(s) of prolonged attenuation of allergic responses after modulation of idiotypic regulatory network.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elizabeth J SimmsClinical Immunology & Allergy and Respirology Divisions, Department of Medicine and Firestone Institute for Respiratory Health, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Ijlal SyedClinical Immunology & Allergy and Respirology Divisions, Department of Medicine and Firestone Institute for Respiratory Health, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Christopher RudulierClinical Immunology & Allergy and Respirology Divisions, Department of Medicine and Firestone Institute for Respiratory Health, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Mark LarchéClinical Immunology & Allergy and Respirology Divisions, Department of Medicine and Firestone Institute for Respiratory Health, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
McMaster University · CA

Funding

The effect of peptide therapy and allergen provocation on Fel d1-specific T CellsU19AI100266 · NIAID · MCMASTER UNIVERSITY · PI LARCHE, MARK · 2012 to 2018
$6.5M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI100266
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) with whole allergens or allergen extracts has been in use for more than one hundred years. It is clinically efficacious and disease-modifying. However, AIT is also associated with a significant adverse events profile, including the potential to cause severe, systemic allergic reactions. One alternative to traditional whole-antigen AIT is peptide immunotherapy, which uses small synthetic peptide immunoregulatory epitopes (SPIRE) representing T cell epitopes from the allergen of interest. Peptide immunotherapy is being developed for the treatment of allergic and autoimmune diseases where pathogenesis is T cell-dependent. Short, soluble, monomeric peptide fragments avoid the problem of IgE-mediated adverse events (since the peptides will not cross-link allergen-specific IgE on the surface of effector cells such as mast cells and basophils). However, such peptides retain the capability to induce T cell tolerance and immunoregulation. In early clinical trials, efficacy has been demonstrated months to years after the cessation of a short course of treatment, supporting the conclusion that this approach is disease-modifying, changing the natural history of the disease. The improved safety profile of short peptides allows for larger molar-equivalent doses to be administered in shorter time frames than AIT; treatment can be completed in as few as four intradermal injections, while efficacy persists for two years or more.

Indexed as

allergyPeptide immunotherapysynthetic peptide immunoregulatory epitopeT cell epitope

Identifiers

PMID32953388
PMCPMC7500489
OpenAlexW2001013276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.