ReviewCureus2020
Evaluation of the Risk of Getting Peripheral Artery Disease in Rheumatoid Arthritis and the Selection of Appropriate Diagnostic Methods.
Review in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiovascular Risk Assessment in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Genetic association between immune-mediated inflammatory diseases and peripheral artery disease: a Mendelian randomization study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Cardiovascular Risk Assessment in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Accelerated Atherosclerosis, New Biomarkers, and the Effects of Biological Therapy.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Visualizing novel connections and genetic similarities across diseases using a network-medicine based approach.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Ischemic Heart Disease and Rheumatoid Arthritis-Two Conditions, the Same Background.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to review the evidence regarding the association between peripheral artery disease (PAD) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), as well as influential underlying factors and diagnostic options. Eligible literature was searched in PubMed published up to June 1, 2020, in English. Case studies, case series, reviews, and meta-analyses were excluded. We also excluded non-human studies and those 20 years and older. A total of 44 studies were finally incorporated in the narrative review. The results indicated that compared to controls, RA patients are more prone to PAD. Traditional risk factors, disease-characteristics, vitamin D deficiency, therapy used, and other relevant conditions have a variable effect on overall PAD progression. Studies comparing diagnostic options revealed that vascular function and morphology are connected but are still distinctive processes. In early-stage disease, there are functional alterations in the endothelium that can be controlled by anti-inflammatory medications. Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI) <0.9 might not be quite susceptible to PAD evaluation. Supplemental diagnostic tools could detect vascular disease in the preclinical stage. Most risk factors are adjustable, and the management will have a good impact on vascular health. PAD is mostly subclinical when the therapeutic options have a better impact. Diagnostic modalities should be chosen depending on the features of RA. In addition, multiple diagnostic options increase the accuracy of PAD diagnosis. Future prospective studies with larger populations at different age groups and different disease activity duration are essential to make firm conclusions and better understand the phenomenon of RA and PAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.