Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32953294›Full record

ReviewCureus2020

Socioeconomic Impact of COVID-19 on Spinal Instrumentation Companies in the Era of Decreased Elective Surgery.

Brian Fiani, Ryne Jenkins, Imran Siddiqi, Asif Khan, Ashley Taylor

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The sitting vs standing spine.North American Spine Society journal · 2022
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Brian FianiNeurosurgery, Desert Regional Medical Center, Palm Springs, USA.
Ryne JenkinsCollege of Osteopathic Medicine, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, USA.
Imran SiddiqiCollege of Osteopathic Medicine, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, USA.
Asif KhanPodiatry, Beaumont Hospital, Farmington Hills, USA.
Ashley TaylorPsychological, Health, and Learning Sciences, University of Houston, Houston, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the onset of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) global health crisis, there has been an unprecedented change to the field of spinal surgery. Comprehensive protocols and algorithms have been implemented globally to maximize available bed space, conserve personal protective equipment, and to minimize exposure. This has resulted in a sharp decline in elective spinal surgery and placed an undue burden on the spinal industry. As the landscape of elective surgery changes, this paper looks to analyze the effects the COVID-19 pandemic has and will have on spinal instrumentation companies, surgeons, and the spinal industry. Changes in government policies, patient care, financial markets, and distribution have all presented an unprecedented strain on spinal instrumentation companies. A narrative literature review was performed using published literature from PubMed. Due to the socioeconomic and financial nature of this review, data collection from financial references was also obtained and cited. With significant financial losses reported throughout the spinal industry and medical field, this paper discusses managing the COVID-19 pandemic and the future prospectus moving forward. As the pandemic continues to unfold, it remains difficult to predict the exact timing for broad resumption of elective medical procedures, and the extent to which the pandemic will affect the industry. Preparation aimed at facilitating efficient resource allocation and communication among surgeons, surgical instrumentation representatives and hospital leadership is essential as we transition forward and reestablish normalcy under the new constraints of COVID-19.

Indexed as

covid-19financialinstrumentation companiessocioeconomicsspine surgery

Identifiers

PMID32953294
PMCPMC7491687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.