ArticlePeerJ2020
Prognostic implications of metabolism-associated gene signatures in colorectal cancer.
Article in PeerJ, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification and validation of a Golgi apparatus related gene signature for prognosis prediction and immune microenvironment profiling in colorectal cancer.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- A mitochondrial lipid metabolism-related gene signature predicts prognosis and immune landscape in colorectal cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Article
- Constructing a novel mitochondrial metabolism-related genes signature to evaluate tumor immune microenvironment and predict survival of colorectal cancer.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Prognostic, oncogenic roles, and pharmacogenomic features of AMD1 in hepatocellular carcinoma.Cancer cell international · 2024Article
- PBK correlates with prognosis, immune escape and drug response in LUAD.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Epigenetic and metabolic reprogramming in inflammatory bowel diseases: diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in colorectal cancer.Cancer cell international · 2023Review
- Construction of a DDR-related signature for predicting of prognosis in metastatic colorectal carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Cuproplasia characterization in colon cancer assists to predict prognosis and immunotherapeutic response.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Construction and Validation of a Protein-associated Prognostic Model for Gastrointestinal Cancer.Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening · 2023Article
- The double faced role of xanthine oxidoreductase in cancer.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2022Review
- Identification and validation of prognosis-associated DNA repair gene signatures in colorectal cancer.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Construction and validation of mIET systems biology · 2022Article
- Molecular Characteristics, Oncogenic Roles, and Relevant Immune and Pharmacogenomic Features of EVA1B in Colorectal Cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- Metastatic colorectal cancer and type 2 diabetes: prognostic and genetic interactions.Molecular oncology · 2022Article
- Construction of a Prognostic Model Based on Cuproptosis-Related lncRNA Signatures in Pancreatic Cancer.Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology · 2022Article
- Prognostic implications of ferroptosis-associated gene signature in colon adenocarcinoma.World journal of clinical cases · 2021Article
- Metabolism-associated genes in occurrence and development of gastrointestinal cancer: Latest progress and future prospect.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2021Review
- Identification of hub genes and functional modules in colon adenocarcinoma based on public databases by bioinformatics analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2021Article
- Investigating the Mechanism ofEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common and deadly malignancies. Novel biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of this disease must be identified. Besides, metabolism plays an essential role in the occurrence and development of CRC. This article aims to identify some critical prognosis-related metabolic genes (PRMGs) and construct a prognosis model of CRC patients for clinical use. We obtained the expression profiles of CRC from The Cancer Genome Atlas database (TCGA), then identified differentially expressed PRMGs by R and Perl software. Hub genes were filtered out by univariate Cox analysis and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator Cox analysis. We used functional enrichment analysis methods, such as Gene Ontology, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes, and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis, to identify involved signaling pathways of PRMGs. The nomogram predicted overall survival (OS). Calibration traces were used to evaluate the consistency between the actual and the predicted survival rate. Finally, a prognostic model was constructed based on six metabolic genes (NAT2, XDH, GPX3, AKR1C4, SPHK1, and ADCY5), and the risk score was an independent prognostic prognosticator. Genetic expression and risk score were significantly correlated with clinicopathologic characteristics of CRC. A nomogram based on the clinicopathological feature of CRC and risk score accurately predicted the OS of individual CRC cancer patients. We also validated the results in the independent colorectal cancer cohorts GSE39582 and GSE87211. Our study demonstrates that the risk score is an independent prognostic biomarker and is closely correlated with the malignant clinicopathological characteristics of CRC patients. We also determined some metabolic genes associated with the survival and clinical stage of CRC as potential biomarkers for CRC diagnosis and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.