ArticleCurrent pathobiology reports2019
High-resolution microscopy for imaging cancer pathobiology.
Article in Current pathobiology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Feasibility of label-free multiphoton luminescence imaging to track the fate of inhaled gold nanoparticles inBiophotonics discovery · 2026Article
- Roadmap for light interaction with biophotonic surfaces and their diverse applications.Journal of biomedical optics · 2026Article
- Optical super-resolution histology of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples: challenges and opportunities.Nature communications · 2025Review
- Multiphoton Luminescence Imaging: A Label-Free Tool for Visualizing the Long-Term Fate of Gold Nanoparticles in Tissue.ACS nano · 2025Article
- Multimodal Framework in Lung Cancer Management: Integrating Liquid Biopsy with Traditional Diagnostic Techniques.Cancer management and research · 2025Review
- Advancements and Practical Considerations for Biophysical Research: Navigating the Challenges and Future of Super-resolution Microscopy.Chemical & biomedical imaging · 2024Review
- 3D reconstruction of skin and spatial mapping of immune cell density, vascular distance and effects of sun exposure and aging.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Cancer Cell Culture: The Basics and Two-Dimensional Cultures.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Article
- Super-Resolution Microscopy: Shedding New Light onFrontiers in chemistry · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewLight microscopy plays an essential role in clinical diagnosis and understanding the pathogenesis of cancer. Conventional bright-field microscope is used to visualize abnormality in tissue architecture and nuclear morphology, but often suffers from many limitations. This review focuses on the potential of new imaging techniques to improve basic and clinical research in pathobiology. RECENT
findingsLight microscopy has significantly expanded its ability in resolution, imaging volume, speed and contrast. It now allows 3D high-resolution volumetric imaging of tissue architecture from large tissue and molecular structures at nanometer resolution. SUMMARY: Pathologists and researchers now have access to various imaging tools to study cancer pathobiology in both breadth and depth. Although clinical adoption of a new technique is slow, the new imaging tools will provide significant new insights and open new avenues for improving early cancer detection, personalized risk assessment and identifying the best treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.