Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32953175›Full record

ArticleJournal of aging research2020

Using Augmented Reality with Older Adults in the Community to Select Design Features for an Age-Friendly Park: A Pilot Study.

Edgar R Vieira, Fernanda Civitella, Jorge Carreno, Miburge G Junior, Cesar F Amorim, Newton D'Souza, Ebru Ozer, Francisco Ortega, Jansen A Estrázulas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of aging research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Edgar R VieiraDepartment of Physical Therapy, Florida International University, 11200 SW 8 St, AHC3-430, Miami, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1011-5077
Fernanda CivitellaDepartment of Physical Therapy, Florida International University, 11200 SW 8 St, AHC3-430, Miami, FL, USA.
Jorge CarrenoDepartment of Physical Therapy, Florida International University, 11200 SW 8 St, AHC3-430, Miami, FL, USA.
Miburge G JuniorDepartment of Physical Therapy, Florida International University, 11200 SW 8 St, AHC3-430, Miami, FL, USA.
Cesar F AmorimDepartment of Physical Therapy, Florida International University, 11200 SW 8 St, AHC3-430, Miami, FL, USA.
Newton D'SouzaDepartment of Interior Architecture, Florida International University, 11200 SW 8 Street, PCA 387b, Miami, FL 33199, USA.
Ebru OzerDepartment of Landscape Architecture + Environmental and Urban Design, Florida International University, 11200 SW 8 St., PCA 374A, Miami, FL 33199, USA.
Francisco OrtegaDepartment of Computer Science, Colorado State University, 1873 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1873, USA.
Jansen A EstrázulasDepartment of Physical Therapy, Florida International University, 11200 SW 8 St, AHC3-430, Miami, FL, USA.
Florida International University · USColorado State University · USUniversidade Federal de Sergipe · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sedentary behavior is prevalent in older adults. Older adults often underutilize public parks for exercising because the parks do not support their needs and preferences. Engaging older adults on the redesign of parks may help promote active lifestyles. The objectives of this pilot study were to evaluate (1) the effects of wearing augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) glasses on balance; (2) the effects of different virtual walls separating the walking trail from the roadway on older adults' gait, and (3) the preferences of the participants regarding wall design and other features. The participants were ten older adults (68 ± 5 years) who lived within two miles from the park. Balance and gait were assessed using a force plate and an instrumented mat. It was feasible to use AR with older adults in the park to evaluate features for redesign. Motion sickness was not an issue when using AR glasses, but balance was affected when wearing VR goggles. The area of postural sway increased approximately 25% when wearing AR glasses, and it increased by close to 70% when wearing VR goggles compared to no glasses. This difference is clinically relevant; however, we did not have enough power to identify the differences as statistically significant because of the small sample size and large variability. Different walls did not significantly affect the participants' gait either because they did not alter the way they walked or because the holograms were insufficiently realistic to cause changes. The participants preferred a transparent wall rather than tall or short solid walls to separate the park from the roadway.

Identifiers

PMID32953175
PMCPMC7482015
OpenAlexW3081957812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.