ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2020
Toward understanding the dynamic state of 3D genome.
Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- 4D Genome Analysis Using PHi-C2.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Multiscale molecular modeling of chromatin with MultiMM: From nucleosomes to the whole genome.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Article
- Melanoma-specific mutation hotspots in distal, non-coding, promoter-interacting regions implicate novel candidate driver genes.British journal of cancer · 2024Article
- Large-scale data-driven and physics-based models offer insights into the relationships among the structures, dynamics, and functions of chromosomes.Journal of molecular cell biology · 2023Review
- Single-molecule tracking of Nanog and Oct4 in living mouse embryonic stem cells uncovers a feedback mechanism of pluripotency maintenance.The EMBO journal · 2023Article
- PHi-C2: interpreting Hi-C data as the dynamic 3D genome state.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The three-dimensional (3D) genome organization and its role in biological activities have been investigated for over a decade in the field of cell biology. Recent studies using live-imaging and polymer simulation have suggested that the higher-order chromatin structures are dynamic; the stochastic fluctuations of nucleosomes and genomic loci cannot be captured by bulk-based chromosome conformation capture techniques (Hi-C). In this review, we focus on the physical nature of the 3D genome architecture. We first describe how to decode bulk Hi-C data with polymer modeling. We then introduce our recently developed PHi-C method, a computational tool for modeling the fluctuations of the 3D genome organization in the presence of stochastic thermal noise. We also present another new method that analyzes the dynamic rheology property (represented as microrheology spectra) as a measure of the flexibility and rigidity of genomic regions over time. By applying these methods to real Hi-C data, we highlighted a temporal hierarchy embedded in the 3D genome organization; chromatin interaction boundaries are more rigid than the boundary interior, while functional domains emerge as dynamic fluctuations within a particular time interval. Our methods may bridge the gap between live-cell imaging and Hi-C data and elucidate the nature of the dynamic 3D genome organization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.