Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32952934›Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2020

An integrative deep learning framework for classifying molecular subtypes of breast cancer.

Md Mohaiminul Islam, Shujun Huang, Rasif Ajwad, Chen Chi, Yang Wang, Pingzhao Hu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Multi-omic network inference from time-series data.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A review on trends in development and translation of omics signatures in cancer.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. [Identification of breast cancer subtypes based on graph convolutional network].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2024
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Md Mohaiminul IslamDepartment of Biochemistry and Medical Genetics, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3E 0W3, Canada.
Shujun HuangCollege of Pharmacy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3E 0W3, Canada.
Rasif AjwadDepartment of Biochemistry and Medical Genetics, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3E 0W3, Canada.
Chen ChiDepartment of Biochemistry and Medical Genetics, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3E 0W3, Canada.
Yang WangDepartment of Computer Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3E 0W3, Canada.
Pingzhao HuDepartment of Biochemistry and Medical Genetics, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3E 0W3, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Classification of breast cancer subtypes using multi-omics profiles is a difficult problem since the data sets are high-dimensional and highly correlated. Deep neural network (DNN) learning has demonstrated advantages over traditional methods as it does not require any hand-crafted features, but rather automatically extract features from raw data and efficiently analyze high-dimensional and correlated data. We aim to develop an integrative deep learning framework for classifying molecular subtypes of breast cancer. We collect copy number alteration and gene expression data measured on the same breast cancer patients from the Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium. We propose a deep learning model to integrate the omics datasets for predicting their molecular subtypes. The performance of our proposed DNN model is compared with some baseline models. Furthermore, we evaluate the misclassification of the subtypes using the learned deep features and explore their usefulness for clustering the breast cancer patients. We demonstrate that our proposed integrative deep learning model is superior to other deep learning and non-deep learning based models. Particularly, we get the best prediction result among the deep learning-based integration models when we integrate the two data sources using the concatenation layer in the models without sharing the weights. Using the learned deep features, we identify 6 breast cancer subgroups and show that Her2-enriched samples can be classified into more than one tumor subtype. Overall, the integrated model show better performance than those trained on individual data sources.

Indexed as

Breast cancerClassificationData integrationDeep learningOmics data

Identifiers

PMID32952934
PMCPMC7473884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.