Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32952933›Full record

ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2020

T cell receptor sequence clustering and antigen specificity.

Milena Vujovic, Kristine Fredlund Degn, Frederikke Isa Marin, Anna-Lisa Schaap-Johansen, Benny Chain, Thomas Lars Andresen, Joseph Kaplinsky, Paolo Marcatili

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Milena VujovicDTU HealthTech, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Ørsteds Plads, Building 345C, DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Kristine Fredlund DegnDTU HealthTech, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Ørsteds Plads, Building 345C, DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Frederikke Isa MarinDTU HealthTech, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Ørsteds Plads, Building 345C, DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Anna-Lisa Schaap-JohansenDTU HealthTech, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Ørsteds Plads, Building 345C, DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Benny ChainUCL Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, Wing 3.2, Cruciform Building, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
Thomas Lars AndresenDTU HealthTech, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Ørsteds Plads, Building 345C, DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Joseph KaplinskyLudwig Institute for Cancer Research Ltd, University of Oxford, Nuffield Department of Medicine, Old Road Campus Research Building, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7DQ, United Kingdom.
Paolo MarcatiliDTU HealthTech, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Ørsteds Plads, Building 345C, DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 24314
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been increasing interest in the role of T cells and their involvement in cancer, autoimmune and infectious diseases. However, the nature of T cell receptor (TCR) epitope recognition at a repertoire level is not yet fully understood. Due to technological advances a plethora of TCR sequences from a variety of disease and treatment settings has become readily available. Current efforts in TCR specificity analysis focus on identifying characteristics in immune repertoires which can explain or predict disease outcome or progression, or can be used to monitor the efficacy of disease therapy. In this context, clustering of TCRs by sequence to reflect biological similarity, and especially to reflect antigen specificity have become of paramount importance. We review the main TCR sequence clustering methods and the different similarity measures they use, and discuss their performance and possible improvement. We aim to provide guidance for non-specialists who wish to use TCR repertoire sequencing for disease tracking, patient stratification or therapy prediction, and to provide a starting point for those aiming to develop novel techniques for TCR annotation through clustering.

Indexed as

ClusteringEpitope specificityT cell receptor distanceT cell receptor similarityT cell receptor (TCR)T cell repertoire

Identifiers

PMID32952933
PMCPMC7473833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.