ReviewIndian journal of orthopaedics2020
Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy in Chondral Defects of Knee: Current Concept Review.
Review in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current trends in the treatment of focal cartilage lesions: a comprehensive review.EFORT open reviews · 2025Review
- Knee Osteochondral Defect Reconstruction With Autologous Bone Grafting and Mesenchymal Cell Transplantation.Arthroscopy techniques · 2022Article
- Application Effect of Different Concentrations of Platelet-Rich Plasma Combined with Quadriceps Training on Cartilage Repair of Knee Osteoarthritis.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2022Article
- Long wait times for knee and hip total joint replacement in Canada: An isolated health system problem, or a symptom of a larger problem?Osteoarthritis and cartilage open · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeFull-thickness cartilage defects if left alone would increase the risk of osteoarthritis (OA) with severe associated pain and functional disability. Articular cartilage defect may result from direct trauma or chronic degeneration. The capability of the mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to repair and regenerate cartilage has been widely investigated. This review describes current trends in MSC biology, the sourcing, expansion, application and role of MSCs in chondral defects of human knees.
methodsThe studies referencing MSCs and knee osteoarthritis were searched (from1998 to 2020) using PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and the ClinicalTrials.gov with keywords (MSCs, chondral defects or cartilage degeneration of knee, cartilage regeneration, chondrogenesis, tissue engineering, efficacy and safety). The inclusion criteria were based on use of MSCs for treatment of chondral defects and osteoarthritis of the knee, English language and human studies.
resultsThe history of MSC research from the initial discovery of their multipotency to the more recent recognition of their role in cartilage defects of knee is elucidated. Several studies have demonstrated promising results in the clinical application for repair of chondral defects as an adjuvant or independent procedure. Intra-articular MSCs provide improvements in pain and function in knee osteoarthritis at short-term follow-up in many studies. The tendency of MSCs to differentiate into fibrocartilage affecting the outcome is a common issue faced by researchers.
conclusionSome efficacy has been shown of MSCs for cartilage repair in osteoarthritis; however, the evidence of efficacy of intra-articular MSCs on both clinical outcomes and cartilage repair remains limited. Despite the high quality of evidence to support, MSC therapy has emerged but further refinement of methodology will be necessary to support its routine clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.