Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32952610›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary applications2020

Integrating genetic and nongenetic drivers of somatic evolution during carcinogenesis: The biplane model.

Robert A Gatenby, Stanislav Avdieiev, Kenneth Y Tsai, Joel S Brown

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary applications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Updating the Definition of Cancer.Molecular cancer research : MCR · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Insights From the Ecology of Information to Cancer Control.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robert A GatenbyCancer Biology and Evolution Program Moffitt Cancer Center Tampa FL USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1621-1510
Stanislav AvdieievCancer Biology and Evolution Program Moffitt Cancer Center Tampa FL USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1078-1459
Kenneth Y TsaiCancer Biology and Evolution Program Moffitt Cancer Center Tampa FL USA.
Joel S BrownCancer Biology and Evolution Program Moffitt Cancer Center Tampa FL USA.
Moffitt Cancer Center · US

Funding

The Physi(ologi)cal Microenvironment and its Role in Tumor Invasion and MetastaseU54CA143970 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI GATENBY, ROBERT A · 2009 to 2014
$9.3M
Eco-Evolutionary dynamics of NSCLC to immunotherapy: Response and ResistanceU01CA232382 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI ANDERSON, ALEXANDER ROBERTSON ALLAN, ANTONIA, SCOTT J. · 2018 to 2022
$3.3M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA232382NCI NIH HHS U54 CA143970
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The multistep transition from a normal to a malignant cellular phenotype is often termed "somatic evolution" caused by accumulating random mutations. Here, we propose an alternative model in which the initial genetic state of a cancer cell is the result of mutations that occurred throughout the lifetime of the host. However, these mutations are not carcinogenic because normal cells in multicellular organism cannot ordinarily evolve. That is, proliferation and death of normal cells are controlled by local tissue constraints typically governed by nongenomic information dynamics in the cell membrane. As a result, the cells of a multicellular organism have a fitness that is identical to the host, which is then the unit of natural selection. Somatic evolution of a cell can occur only when its fate becomes independent of host constraints. Now, survival, proliferation, and death of individual cells are dependent on Darwinian dynamics. This cellular transition from host-defined fitness to self-defined fitness may, consistent with the conventional view of carcinogenesis, result from mutations that render the cell insensitive to host controls. However, an identical state will result when surrounding tissue cannot exert control because of injury, inflammation, aging, or infection. Here, all surviving cells within the site of tissue damage default to self-defined fitness functions allowing them to evolve so that the mutations accumulated over the lifetime of the host now serve as the genetic heritage of an evolutionary unit of selection. Furthermore, tissue injury generates a new ecology cytokines and growth factors that might promote proliferation in cells with prior receptor mutations. This model integrates genetic and nongenetic dynamics into cancer development and is consistent with both clinical observations and prior experiments that divided carcinogenesis to initiation, promotion, and progression steps.

Indexed as

biplane model of carcinogenesiscarcinogenesisfitness functionsomatic evolution

Identifiers

PMID32952610
PMCPMC7484850
OpenAlexW3015350932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.