ArticleInternational journal of health sciences
The risk of morbidities in newborns of antenatal vitamin D supplemented gestational diabetes mellitus patients.
Article in International journal of health sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy and maternal and neonatal outcomes: results from a quantitative umbrella meta-analysis.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Pooled it
- Participant attrition and perinatal outcomes in prenatal vitamin D-supplemented gestational diabetes mellitus patients in Asia: A meta-analysis.World journal of methodology · 2022Article
- Article
- Article
- Changes in anthropometric and blood 25-hydroxyvitamin D measurements in antenatal vitamin supplemented gestational diabetes mellitus patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsJournal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is no established antenatal intervention that reduces the risk of preeclampsia and preterm delivery in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) mothers and hyperbilirubinemia, hypoglycemia, and hospitalization in their newborns. Henceforth, this study aims to study how these risks change on prenatal vitamin D supplementation.
methodsRandomized parallel arm trials comparing these interventions' effect on the above outcomes were searched in the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus, irrespective date, and language of publication. Each eligible trial's risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane collaboration tool. Using random-effects meta-analysis, the risk of the outcomes was compared.
resultsSix eligible Iran-based trials of about 476 participants were included in this review. Four trials complemented vitamin D along with other nutrients. Overall, the risk of bias was low in these trials. The newborns of antenatal vitamin D recipients have a reduced risk of hyperbilirubinemia (relative risk [RR] = 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.33, 0.64; I
conclusionNewborns of GDM mothers who received vitamin D as a sole or co-supplement antenatally have a decreased risk of hyperbilirubinemia and hospitalization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32952500PMC7475207W3087330854What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.