Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32952476›Full record

ArticleJournal of chiropractic medicine2019

The Clinical Use of Monolaurin as a Dietary Supplement: A Review of the Literature.

Lisa A Barker, Barclay W Bakkum, Cynthia Chapman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chiropractic medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Protective Barriers Provided by the Epidermis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Benefits of Virgin Coconut Oil in Diet toAquaculture nutrition · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lisa A BarkerHartsburg Chiropractic Health Center, Danbury, Connecticut.
Barclay W BakkumIllinois College of Optometry, Chicago, Illinois.
Cynthia ChapmanOccoquan Family Chiropractic, Occoquan, Virginia.
Danbury Hospital · USIllinois College of Optometry · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to determine what the peer-reviewed literature says about the clinical applications, therapeutic dosages, bioavailability, efficacy, and safety of monolaurin as a dietary supplement.

methodsThis was a narrative review using the PubMed database and the terms "monolaurin" and its chemical synonyms. Commercial websites that sell monolaurin were also searched for pertinent references. The reference sections of the newer articles were searched for any other relevant articles. Consensus was reached among the authors as to what articles had clinical relevance.

resultsTwenty-eight articles were found that appeared to address the clinical use of monolaurin.

conclusionThere are many articles that address the antimicrobial effects of monolaurin in vitro. Only 3 peer-reviewed papers that evidence in vivo antimicrobial effects of monolaurin in humans were located, and these were only for intravaginal and intraoral-that is, topical-use. No peer-reviewed evidence was found for the clinical use of monolaurin as a human dietary supplement other than as a nutrient.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntiviral Agents

Identifiers

PMID32952476
PMCPMC7486475
OpenAlexW3083329898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.