Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32952235›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Statistical Association2020

Robust Clustering with Subpopulation-specific Deviations.

Briana J K Stephenson, Amy H Herring, Andrew Olshan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. LACE-UP: An ensemble machine-learning method for health subtype classification on multidimensional binary data.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Identifying dietary consumption patterns from survey data: a Bayesian nonparametric latent class model.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, (Statistics in Society) · 2024
    Article
  5. Bayesian cluster analysis.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Briana J K StephensonDepartment of Biostatistics Postdoctoral Research Associate, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Postdoctoral Research Associate, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599.
Amy H HerringDepartment of Statistical Science, Duke University; Sara & Charles Ayres Professor of Statistical Science, Duke University, Durham, NC 27709.
Andrew OlshanDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, The National Birth Defects Prevention Study; Barbara Hulka Distinguished Professor, Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599.

Funding

UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CLINICAL NUTRITION RESEARCH UNITP30DK056350 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SUSAN M. SMITH · 1999 to 2026
$31.6M
Biostatstics for Research in Environmental HealthT32ES007018 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Stephanie Engel, Rebecca Fry · 1985 to 2026
$31.3M
Research Services CoreP2CHD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KAREN B GUZZO · 2015 to 2026
$9.6M
Component A: BD-STEPS II Core at North Carolina Center for Birth Defects Research and Prevention (NC BDSTEPS II Core)U01DD001231 · DD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DESROSIERS, TANIA A., OLSHAN, ANDREW · 2018 to 2022
$4.2M
North Carolina Birth Defects Study To Evaluate Pregnancy Exposures (NC BD-STEPS)U01DD001036 · DD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI OLSHAN, ANDREW · 2013 to 2017
$3.5M
Reproducibility and Robustness of Dimensionality ReductionR01ES027498 · NIEHS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HERRING, AMY H · 2017 to 2021
$2.9M
Bayesian Methods for High-Dimensional Epidemiologic DataR01ES020619 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HERRING, AMY H · 2011 to 2015
$1.7M
NCBDD CDC HHS U01 DD001036NCBDD CDC HHS U01 DD001231NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD050924NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK056350NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES020619NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES027498NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The National Birth Defects Prevention Study (NBDPS) is a case-control study of birth defects conducted across 10 U.S. states. Researchers are interested in characterizing the etiologic role of maternal diet, collected using a food frequency questionnaire. Because diet is multi-dimensional, dimension reduction methods such as cluster analysis are often used to summarize dietary patterns. In a large, heterogeneous population, traditional clustering methods, such as latent class analysis, used to estimate dietary patterns can produce a large number of clusters due to a variety of factors, including study size and regional diversity. These factors result in a loss of interpretability of patterns that may differ due to minor consumption changes. Based on adaptation of the local partition process, we propose a new method, Robust Profile Clustering, to handle these data complexities. Here, participants may be clustered at two levels: (1) globally, where women are assigned to an overall population-level cluster via an overfitted finite mixture model, and (2) locally, where regional variations in diet are accommodated via a beta-Bernoulli process dependent on subpopulation differences. We use our method to analyze the NBDPS data, deriving pre-pregnancy dietary patterns for women in the NBDPS while accounting for regional variability.

Indexed as

food frequency questionnairelatent class analysislocal partition processnutritional epidemiology

Identifiers

PMID32952235
PMCPMC7500490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.