Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32952060›Full record

ReviewTrends in parasitology2020

Ecological and Evolutionary Challenges for Wildlife Vaccination.

K M Barnett, David J Civitello

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in parasitology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Inferring the disruption of rabies circulation in vampire bat populations using a betaherpesvirus-vectored transmissible vaccine.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Oral Sylvatic Plague Vaccine Does Not Adequately Protect Prairie Dogs (Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.) · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

K M BarnettDepartment of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. Electronic address: katherine.mary.barnett@emory.edu.
David J CivitelloDepartment of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Emory University · US

Funding

Resource competition drives natural and rebound dynamics of snails and schistosomesR01AI150774 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI CIVITELLO, DAVID JAMES · 2020 to 2025
$1.7M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI150774
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wildlife vaccination is of urgent interest to reduce disease-induced extinction and zoonotic spillover events. However, several challenges complicate its application to wildlife. For example, vaccines rarely provide perfect immunity. While some protection may seem better than none, imperfect vaccination can present epidemiological, ecological, and evolutionary challenges. While anti-infection and antitransmission vaccines reduce parasite transmission, antidisease vaccines may undermine herd immunity, select for increased virulence, or promote spillover. These imperfections interact with ecological and logistical constraints that are magnified in wildlife, such as poor control and substantial trait variation within and among species. Ultimately, we recommend approaches such as trait-based vaccination, modeling tools, and methods to assess community- and ecosystem-level vaccine safety to address these concerns and bolster wildlife vaccination campaigns.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAnimalsAnimals, WildEcosystemParasitic Diseases, AnimalVaccinationVaccinesVaccinesconservationimperfect immunityspillovervaccinationwildlife

Identifiers

PMID32952060
PMCPMC7498468
OpenAlexW3087334866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.