ArticleTrends in genetics : TIG2020
Base Editing Landscape Extends to Perform Transversion Mutation.
Article in Trends in genetics : TIG, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Advancements in genomic crop techniques and considerations for regulation and food safety.Transgenic research · 2025Review
- Applications of Genome-wide Screening of CRISPR/Cas9 Knockout Library in Identifying Novel Molecular Targets for Xenobiotics.Environment & health (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Review
- CRISPR-GATE: a one-stop repository and guide to computational resources for genome editing experimentation.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- Emerging trends in transgene-free crop development: insights into genome editing and its regulatory overview.Plant molecular biology · 2025Review
- Developing a highly efficient CGBE base editor in watermelon.Horticulture research · 2023Article
- Prime editing in hematopoietic stem cells-FromFrontiers in genome editing · 2023Review
- CRISPR applications for Duchenne muscular dystrophy: From animal models to potential therapies.WIREs mechanisms of disease · 2023Review
- Reconstructed glycosylase base editors GBE2.0 with enhanced C-to-G base editing efficiency and purity.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2022Article
- The application of CRISPR/Cas technologies toaBIOTECH · 2022Review
- Efficient gene editing through an intronic selection marker in cells.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2022Article
- Predictable NHEJ Insertion and Assessment of HDR Editing Strategies in Plants.Frontiers in genome editing · 2022Article
- Precise plant genome editing using base editors and prime editors.Nature plants · 2021Review
- STAT1 gain-of-function heterozygous cell models reveal diverse interferon-signature gene transcriptional responses.NPJ genomic medicine · 2021Article
- C-to-G Base Editing Enhances Oleic Acid Production by Generating Novel Alleles ofFrontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Exploring C-To-G Base Editing in Rice, Tomato, and Poplar.Frontiers in genome editing · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Comment on
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Base editors have drawn considerable academic and industrial attention in recent years because of their ability to alter single DNA bases with precision. However, the existing cytosine and adenine base editors can only install transition mutations. Three recent studies (Kurt et al.,Zhao et al., and Chen et al.) expand the base editing toolbox by developing cytosine transversion base editors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32951947What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.