Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32951818›Full record

ReviewBiological psychiatry2021

Four Deep Brain Stimulation Targets for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Are They Different?

Suzanne N Haber, Anastasia Yendiki, Saad Jbabdi

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biological psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. A Multi-Symptom Circuit Architecture of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Prefrontal Network Mechanisms of Psychiatric Deep Brain Stimulation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Suzanne N HaberDepartment of Pharmacology and Physiology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York; Department of Psychiatry, McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, Massachusetts. Electronic address: suzanne_haber@urmc.rochester.edu.
Anastasia YendikiAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Harvard University and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Saad JbabdiWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Oxford Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Harvard University · USUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

The neural network of OCD, linking NHP and human studiesP50MH106435 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Suzanne N Haber · 2015 to 2026
$28.9M
Continuity of the Limbic Circuit Through the Basal GangliaR01MH045573 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI HABER, SUZANNE N · 1989 to 2024
$10.1M
Medical Research Council MR/L009013/1NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH106435NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH045573
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep brain stimulation is a promising therapeutic approach for patients with treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder, a condition linked to abnormalities in corticobasal ganglia networks. Effective targets are placed in one of four subcortical areas with the goal of capturing prefrontal, anterior cingulate, and basal ganglia connections linked to the limbic system. These include the anterior limb of the internal capsule, the ventral striatum, the subthalamic nucleus, and a midbrain target. The goal of this review is to examine these 4 targets with respect to the similarities and differences of their connections. Following a review of the connections for each target based on anatomic studies in nonhuman primates, we examine the accuracy of diffusion magnetic resonance imaging tractography to replicate those connections in nonhuman primates, before evaluating the connections in the human brain based on diffusion magnetic resonance imaging tractography. Results demonstrate that the four targets generally involve similar connections, all of which are part of the internal capsule. Nonetheless, some connections are unique to each site. Delineating the similarities and differences across targets is a critical step for evaluating and comparing the effectiveness of each and how circuits contribute to the therapeutic outcome. It also underscores the importance that the terminology used for each target accurately reflects its position and its anatomic connections, so as to enable comparisons across clinical studies and for basic scientists to probe mechanisms underlying deep brain stimulation.

Indexed as

Deep Brain StimulationObsessive-Compulsive DisorderSubthalamic NucleusVentral StriatumAnimalsHumansInternal CapsuleAnatomic tracingAnterior limb of the internal capsuleDiffusion magnetic resonance imagingMedial forebrain bundleSubthalamic nucleusVentral striatumWhite matter pathways

Identifiers

PMID32951818
PMCPMC9569132
OpenAlexW3044679380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.