Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32951552›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2020

Social bonds, social status and survival in wild baboons: a tale of two sexes.

Fernando A Campos, Francisco Villavicencio, Elizabeth A Archie, Fernando Colchero, Susan C Alberts

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 118 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Socioecological complexity in primate groups and its cognitive correlates.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Neural basis of social hierarchy across species.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Reevaluating the relationship between female sociality and infant survival in wild baboons.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Testosterone mediates life-history trade-offs in female mammals.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Fernando A CamposDepartment of Anthropology, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Francisco VillavicencioDepartment of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Elizabeth A ArchieDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA.
Fernando ColcheroInterdisciplinary Center on Population Dynamics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Susan C AlbertsDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Duke University · USJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Notre Dame · USUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

THE RANGE OF MALE-FEMALE MORTALITY DIFFERENCESP01AG031719 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI VAUPEL, JAMES W. · 2009 to 2020
$10.2M
A life course perspective on the effects of cumulative early adversity on healthR01AG053330 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME · PI Elizabeth Archie · 2017 to 2026
$3.0M
The biodemography of early adversity: social behavioral processes in a wild animal model.R01AG053308 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI ALBERTS, SUSAN C. · 2018 to 2022
$2.2M
Early adversity and DNA methylation in a primate model of stress and development.R01HD088558 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI TUNG, JENNY · 2017 to 2021
$2.0M
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG031719NIA NIH HHS R01 AG053308NIA NIH HHS R01 AG053330NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD088558
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People who are more socially integrated or have higher socio-economic status live longer. Recent studies in non-human primates show striking convergences with this human pattern: female primates with more social partners, stronger social bonds or higher dominance rank all lead longer lives. However, it remains unclear whether social environments also predict survival in male non-human primates, as it does in men. This gap persists because, in most primates, males disperse among social groups, resulting in many males who disappear with unknown fate and have unknown dates of birth. We present a Bayesian model to estimate the effects of time-varying social covariates on age-specific adult mortality in both sexes of wild baboons. We compare how the survival trajectories of both sexes are linked to social bonds and social status over the life. We find that, parallel to females, male baboons who are more strongly bonded to females have longer lifespans. However, males with higher dominance rank for their age appear to have shorter lifespans. This finding brings new understanding to the adaptive significance of heterosexual social bonds for male baboons: in addition to protecting the male's offspring from infanticide, these bonds may have direct benefits to males themselves. This article is part of the theme issue 'Evolution of the primate ageing process'.

Indexed as

Social BehaviorAge FactorsAnimalsBayes TheoremFemaleKenyaMaleModels, BiologicalMortalityPapio cynocephalusPsychological DistanceSex FactorsSocial DominanceBayesian modeldominance rankmortalityprimatessocial relationshipstime-varying covariates

Identifiers

PMID32951552
PMCPMC7540948
OpenAlexW3087441750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.