Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32951445›Full record

ArticleCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center

Prevalence and Predictor of Cervical Cancer Screening Service Uptake Among Women Aged 25 Years and Above in Sidama Zone, Southern Ethiopia, Using Health Belief Model.

Ermias Yunkura Gemeda, Belayneh Bekele Kare, Dereje Geleta Negera, Lalisa Gemechu Bona, Bedilu Deribe Derese, Netsanet Bogale Akale, Kurabachew Mengistu Kebede, Dubale Dulla Koboto, Achamyelesh Gebretsadik Tekle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Organized Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening: Attendance and Determinants in Rural China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ermias Yunkura GemedaSidama Zonal Health Department, Hawassa, Ethiopia.
Belayneh Bekele KareSidama Zonal Health Department, Hawassa, Ethiopia.
Dereje Geleta NegeraFaculty of Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, 128167Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5264-9501
Lalisa Gemechu BonaFaculty of Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, 128167Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia.
Bedilu Deribe DereseFaculty of Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, 128167Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia.
Netsanet Bogale AkaleFaculty of Medical Sciences, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, 128167Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia.
Kurabachew Mengistu KebedeFaculty of Medical Sciences, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, 128167Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia.
Dubale Dulla KobotoFaculty of Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, 128167Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia.
Achamyelesh Gebretsadik TekleFaculty of Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, 128167Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer affecting women worldwide, and the second leading cancer in Ethiopia. Screening gives protective benefits associated with a reduction in the incidence of invasive cervical cancer and mortality. However, the level of cervical cancer screening uptake is not well document in the country. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and predictors of cervical cancer screening service uptake among women aged 25 years and above in Sidama zone, southern Ethiopia, 2019. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 838 women aged 25 and above years by using an interviewer-administered questionnaire. Multi-stage sampling technique was employed to identify households with women age of 25 and above years who were residing in the selected kebele for more than 6 months. Descriptive and multivariable logistic regression done. P-value <0.05 was considered as significant and presented by adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with 95% C.I. This study showed that among 838 women, only 17.8% (95%CI, 15.2%-20.5%) have undergone for cervical cancer screening. Being age of 35-39 (AOR = 5.2, 95% CI = 2.6-10.6), College and above Educational level (AOR = 3.8, 95% CI = 1.5-9.6), Ever had HIV test (AOR = 2.8, 95% CI = 1.82-4.4) and high perceived self-efficacy (AOR = 4.4, 95% CI = 1.527-12.84) were significant predictors for cervical cancer screening service uptake. The magnitude of cervical cancer screening uptake among women aged 25 years and above was lower than that of the recommended coverage of the target group by the national guideline. Age of women, educational status of women, ever had HIV test, and high perceived self-efficacy were important factors of cervical cancer screening service uptake. So it is very crucial improving cervical cancer screening uptake, through creating awareness and educating women, about the advantage of screening in early detection and management of cervical cancer screening utilization.

Indexed as

Health Belief ModelHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerEthiopiaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansPrevalencePrognosisUterine Cervical Neoplasmscancercancer screeningcervical cancer screeninghealth belief modelSidama

Identifiers

PMID32951445
PMCPMC7791476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.