Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32951172›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021

Simultaneous biofiltration of H

Diana Vela-Aparicio, Daniel F Forero, Mario A Hernández, Pedro F B Brandão, Iván O Cabeza

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Simultaneous biofiltration of HEnvironmental science and pollution research international · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Effects of Key Farm Management Practices on Pullets Welfare-A Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Diana Vela-AparicioInstituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá, Bogotá D.C., Colombia. dgvelaa@unal.edu.co.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0038-4051
Daniel F ForeroFacultad de Ingeniería Ambiental, Universidad Santo Tomás, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.
Mario A HernándezDepartamento de Ingeniería Ambiental, Universidad EAN, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.
Pedro F B BrandãoDepartamento de Química, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.
Iván O CabezaFacultad de Ingeniería Ambiental, Universidad Santo Tomás, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.

Funding

Universidad Nacional de Colombia-División de Investigación 34885Universidad Santo Tomás FODEIN 2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofiltration offers an efficient and economical alternative for the elimination of offensive odors caused by hydrogen sulfide, ammonia, and volatile organic compounds. Considering that packing materials affect the performance and represent the main installation cost, the purpose of this work was to evaluate the biofiltration of H

Indexed as

Air PollutantsCompostingHydrogen SulfideAmmoniaAnimalsChickensFiltrationLigninManureAir PollutantsAmmoniaHydrogen SulfideLigninlignocelluloseManureAmmoniaBiofiltrationCompostHydrogen sulfideLignocellulosic wastesPacking materials

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.