Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32951149›Full record

ReviewDrugs2020

New Agents in Development for Sepsis: Any Reason for Hope?

Philippe Vignon, Pierre-François Laterre, Thomas Daix, Bruno François

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Deep insight into cytokine storm: from pathogenesis to treatment.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Treatment of MRSA Infection: Where are We?Current medicinal chemistry · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. In Situ Neutralization and Detoxification of LPS to Attenuate Hyperinflammation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Philippe VignonMedical-Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Dupuytren Teaching Hospital, 87000, Limoges, France. philippe.vignon@unilim.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4551-5772
Pierre-François LaterreSt Luc University Hospital, Université Catholique de Louvain, Avenue Hippocrate 12, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5712-7449
Thomas DaixMedical-Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Dupuytren Teaching Hospital, 87000, Limoges, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3474-7247
Bruno FrançoisMedical-Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Dupuytren Teaching Hospital, 87000, Limoges, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2531-1652
Inserm · FRCliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis is a syndrome which is defined as a dysregulated host response to infection leading to organ failure. Since it remains one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide, numerous drug candidates have already been tested, and continue to be developed, as potential adjunct therapies. Despite convincing mechanisms of action and robust pre-clinical data, almost all drug candidates in the field of sepsis have failed to demonstrate clinical efficacy in the past two decades. Accordingly, the development of new sepsis drugs has markedly decreased in the past few years. Nevertheless, thanks to a better understanding of sepsis pathophysiology and pathways, new promising drug candidates are currently being developed. Instead of a unique sepsis profile as initially suspected, various phenotypes have been characterised. This has  resulted in the identification of multiple targets for new drugs together with relevant biomarkers, and a better understanding of the most appropriate time to intervention. Within the entire sepsis drugs portfolio, those targeting the immune response are probably the most promising. Monoclonal antibodies targeting either cytokines or infectious agents are undoubtedly part of the potential successful therapeutic classes to come.

Indexed as

Stem Cell TransplantationAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibodies, MonoclonalBacteriaBiomarkersClinical Trials, Phase I as TopicClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicCombined Modality TherapyCytokinesDisease Models, AnimalDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHost Microbial InteractionsHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibodies, MonoclonalBiomarkersCytokinesPathogen-Associated Molecular Pattern MoleculesVirulence Factors

Identifiers

PMID32951149
PMCPMC7502152
OpenAlexW3087463662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.