Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32951119›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2021

Skin closure with surgical staples in ankle fractures: a safe and reliable method.

Gautham Prabhakar, Travis S Bullock, Case W Martin, James C Ryan, John H Cabot, Ahmed A Makhani, Leah P Griffin, Kush Shah, Boris A Zelle

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gautham PrabhakarDepartment of Orthopaedics, UT Health San Antonio, Floyd Curl Dr, MC 7774, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
Travis S BullockLong School of Medicine, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
Case W MartinDepartment of Orthopaedics, UT Health San Antonio, Floyd Curl Dr, MC 7774, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
James C RyanDepartment of Orthopaedics, UT Health San Antonio, Floyd Curl Dr, MC 7774, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
John H CabotLong School of Medicine, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
Ahmed A MakhaniLong School of Medicine, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
Leah P GriffinMedical Solutions Division, 3M Health Care, San Antonio, TX, 78249, USA.
Kush ShahDepartment of Orthopaedics, UT Health San Antonio, Floyd Curl Dr, MC 7774, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
Boris A ZelleDepartment of Orthopaedics, UT Health San Antonio, Floyd Curl Dr, MC 7774, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA. zelle@uthscsa.edu.
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study is to examine the rates of surgical site complications of staple closure versus suture closure following open reduction and internal fixation of closed unstable ankle fractures.

methodsBetween 2014 and 2016, a total of 545 patients with closed ankle fractures were treated at our level-1 trauma centre by means of open reduction and internal fixation. A total of 360 patients matched the inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis of this study. This included 119 patients undergoing wound closure using sutures and 241 patients using surgical staples. The demographics, clinical data, and injury characteristics were recorded. The primary outcome measure was the adverse event of any type of surgical site complication.

resultsThe overall rate of patients with a surgical site complication was 15.6%. There was a trend towards a higher risk of surgical site complication in patients undergoing wound closure with sutures as compared with staples (20.2% versus 13.3%); however, this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.0897). The rate of superficial surgical site infection also trended higher in patients undergoing wound closure with sutures versus staples without demonstrating statistical significance (10.1% versus 5%, P = 0.0678). The rate of deep surgical site infection was similar in both groups.

conclusionThe use of metal staples remains controversial in the setting of orthopedic surgery, particularly involving the foot and ankle. The current study supports that metal staples are a safe and reliable option in the closure of traumatic ankle fractures.

Indexed as

Ankle FracturesHumansSurgical StaplingSurgical Wound InfectionSuturesSuture TechniquesAnkle fractureClosureInfectionStaplesSutures

Identifiers

PMID32951119
OpenAlexW3087395796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.