ArticleInternational ophthalmology2021
A possible strategic role of air during pars plana vitrectomy for macula-involving rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pars plana vitrectomy under air infusion versus conventional fluid infusion for dense vitreous hemorrhage: a retrospective comparative study.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Postoperative complications after successful primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair.BMC ophthalmology · 2023Observational
- Reply to "Letter to the editor relating to Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021. The double-edged role of internal limiting membrane peeling during primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair".Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2021Article
- Metamorphopsia and Morphological Changes in the Macula after Scleral Buckling Surgery for Macula-Off Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment.Journal of ophthalmology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo evaluate the advantages and safety of vitrectomy under air for treating macula-involving rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).
methodsConsecutive patients with macula-involving RRD who underwent vitrectomy under air were recruited. Demographic and clinical data were: age, gender, eye, lens status, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), axial length, intraocular pressure (IOP). RRD parameters were: RRD extent, retinal breaks number. Surgical data were: cataract surgery, tamponade used. Postoperative parameters were: BCVA, IOP at first, third, sixth month, recurrent RD, incidence of retinal folds, subretinal fluid (SRF) persistence, macular displacement.
resultsSeventy-one eyes (71 patients) were recruited. Cataract surgery was performed in 32 of 45 phakic patients. The tamponade used was: sulfur hexafluoride 18% (41), silicon oil (SO) (26), high-density SO (4). BCVA improved significantly from baseline (1.2 ± 0.4 logMAR) to the last control (0.8 ± 0.7 logMAR) (P = 0.03285). Recurrent RD incidence was 14.1%. Postoperative complications were: retinal folds (2), SRF persistence (3), macular displacement (2).
conclusionVitrectomy under air is a safe alternative technique for treating macula-involving RRD. Vitrectomy under air allows surgeon to remove accurately the vitreous from the peripheral retina and facilitates the removal of SRF reducing the complications related to its postoperative persistence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.