Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32951031›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2020

Clinical informatics subspecialists: characterizing a novel evolving workforce.

Sheena Desai, Arash Mostaghimi, Vinod E Nambudiri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Case for the Anesthesiologist-Informaticist.JMIR perioperative medicine · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Gender representation in U.S. biomedical informatics leadership and recognition.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sheena DesaiDepartment of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Arash MostaghimiDepartment of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Vinod E NambudiriDepartment of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe growing complexity of data systems in health care has precipitated increasing demand for clinical informatics subspecialists. The first board certification exam for the clinical informatics subspecialty was offered in 2013. Characterizing trends in this novel workforce is important to inform its development.

methodsWe conducted an exploratory analysis of American Board of Medical Specialties data on individuals certified in clinical informatics from 2013 to 2019 to review trends and demographic characteristics of current subspecialists.

results2018 physicians were certified in clinical informatics from 2013 to 2019. The annual number of awarded certifications declined after 2016. The majority of primary certifications held by clinical informaticians were in broad-based medical specialties relative to primarily procedural specialties.

conclusionsDisparities may exist within the clinical informatics physician workforce with respect to primary specialty certifications and geographic distribution. There remains a need for the creation of fellowship programs to sustain the growth of this workforce.

Indexed as

CertificationEducation, Medical, GraduateSpecialty BoardsAdultAgedFellowships and ScholarshipsHealth WorkforceHumansMedical InformaticsMedicineMiddle AgedPhysiciansUnited Statesclinical informaticscontinuing professional developmentgraduate medical educationhealth informaticsmedical subspecialtyphysician workforce

Identifiers

PMID32951031
PMCPMC7671636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.