Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32950905›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2020

Neural anomalies during vigilance in schizophrenia: Diagnostic specificity and genetic associations.

Samuel D Klein, Laurie L Shekels, Kathryn A McGuire, Scott R Sponheim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Sensory Gating Inventory-Brief.Schizophrenia bulletin open · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Samuel D KleinUniversity of Minnesota Clinical Science and Psychopathology Research Program, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, 75 East River Road, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Laurie L ShekelsMinneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, 1 Veterans Dr. Minneapolis, MN 55417, USA.
Kathryn A McGuireMinneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, 1 Veterans Dr. Minneapolis, MN 55417, USA.
Scott R SponheimMinneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, 1 Veterans Dr. Minneapolis, MN 55417, USA; University of Minnesota, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, 606 24th Ave S, Minneapolis, MN 55454, USA. Electronic address: sponh001@umn.edu.
Minneapolis VA Health Care System · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Perceptual Mechanisms of Visual Hallucinations and Illusions in PsychosisR01MH112583 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI SPONHEIM, SCOTT R · 2017 to 2021
$2.4M
CSRD VA I01 CX000227CSRD VA I01 CX001843NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112583
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Impaired vigilance is a core cognitive deficit in schizophrenia and may serve as an endophenotype (i.e., mark genetic liability). We used a continuous performance task with perceptually degraded stimuli in schizophrenia patients (N = 48), bipolar disorder patients (N = 26), first-degree biological relatives of schizophrenia patients (N = 55) and bipolar disorder patients (N = 28), as well as healthy controls (N = 68) to clarify whether previously reported vigilance deficits and abnormal neural functions were indicative of genetic liability for schizophrenia as opposed to a generalized liability for severe psychopathology. We also examined variation in the Catechol-O-methyltransferase gene to evaluate whether brain responses were related to genetic variation associated with higher-order cognition. Relatives of schizophrenia patients had an increased rate of misidentification of nontarget stimuli as targets when they were perceptually similar, suggestive of difficulties with contour perception. Larger early visual responses (i.e., N1) were associated with better task performance in patients with schizophrenia consistent with enhanced N1 responses reflecting beneficial neural compensation. Additionally, reduced N2 augmentation to target stimuli was specific to schizophrenia. Both patients with schizophrenia and first-degree relatives displayed reduced late cognitive responses (P3b) that predicted worse performance. First-degree relatives of bipolar patients exhibited performance deficits, and displayed aberrant neural responses that were milder than individuals with liability for schizophrenia and dependent on sex. Variation in the Catechol-O-methyltransferase gene was differentially associated with P3b in schizophrenia and bipolar groups. Poor vigilance in schizophrenia is specifically predicted by a failure to enhance early visual responses, weak augmentation of mid-latency brain responses to targets, and limited engagement of late cognitive responses that may be tied to genetic variation associated with prefrontal dopaminergic availability. Experimental results illustrate specific neural functions that distinguish schizophrenia from bipolar disorder and provides evidence for a putative endophenotype that differentiates genetic liability for schizophrenia from severe mental illness more broadly.

Indexed as

Bipolar DisorderSchizophreniaCatechol O-MethyltransferaseEndophenotypesHumansReaction TimeCatechol O-MethyltransferaseBipolar disorderElectrophysiologyEndophenotypeEvoked potentialGenetic liabilitySchizophreniaVigilance

Identifiers

PMID32950905
PMCPMC7502576
OpenAlexW3082996864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.