Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32950177›Full record

ReviewThe American journal of the medical sciences2020

Antimalarials as Antivirals for COVID-19: Believe it or Not!

Biplab K Saha, Alyssa Bonnier, Woon Chong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The American journal of the medical sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. The One Health Concept.British journal of biomedical science · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. The impact of hydroxychloroquine-azithromycin combination on Tpeak-to-end and Tpeak-to-end/QT ratio during a short treatment course.Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc · 2021
    Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Biplab K SahaPulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Ozarks Medical Center, West Plains, Missouri. Electronic address: spanophiliac@yahoo.com.
Alyssa BonnierDivision of Critical Care Nursing, Goldfarb School of Nursing, Barnes Jewish College, St. Louis, Missouri.
Woon ChongDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Albany Medical Center College, Albany, New York.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a novel coronavirus responsible for the coronavirus disease -19 (COVID-19). Since December 2019, SARS-CoV-2 has infected millions of people worldwide, leaving hundreds of thousands dead. Chloroquine (CQ) and Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) are antimalarial medications that have been found to have in vitro efficacy against SARS-CoV-2. Several small prospective studies have shown positive outcomes. However, this result has not been universal, and concerns have been raised regarding the indiscriminate use and potential side effects. The clinicians are conflicted regarding the usage of these medications. Appropriate dose and duration of therapy are unknown. Here, we will discuss the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of CQ and HCQ, as well as review the antiviral properties. The manuscript will also examine the available data from recent clinical and preclinical trials in order to shed light on the apparent inconsistencies.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentAnimalsAntimalarialsAntiviral AgentsChlorocebus aethiopsChloroquineHumansHydroxychloroquineSARS-CoV-2Vero CellsAntimalarialsAntiviral AgentsChloroquineHydroxychloroquineChloroquineCOVID-19HydroxychloroquineSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID32950177
PMCPMC7419247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.