ArticleLancet (London, England)2020
Learning from a retraction.
Article in Lancet (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Impact and Applications of Social Media Platforms for Public Health Responses Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Systematic Literature Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Pooled it
- Application of Artificial Intelligence Methods to Pharmacy Data for Cancer Surveillance and Epidemiology Research: A Systematic Review.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2020Pooled it
- A peer teaching module for medical residents on critical appraisal of medical articles: context and pilot testing.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Real-world evidence: new opportunities for osteoporosis research. Recommendations from a Working Group from the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO).Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2023Review
- The Asian Cardiovascular and Thoracic Annals turns 30.Asian cardiovascular & thoracic annals · 2023Article
- Robotic Abdominal Surgery and COVID-19: A Systematic Review of Published Literature and Peer-Reviewed Guidelines during the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Responsible handling of ethics in data publication.PLoS biology · 2022Article
- Machine-learning-derived predictive score for early estimation of COVID-19 mortality risk in hospitalized patients.PloS one · 2022Article
- Conducting Real-world Evidence Studies on the Clinical Outcomes of Diabetes Treatments.Endocrine reviews · 2021Article
- [COVID-19 and medical publications: How three articles have influenced the media and public decisions in France].La Revue de medecine interne · 2021Review
- Real-world evidence and product development: Opportunities, challenges and risk mitigation.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2021Review
- The COVID-19 puzzle: deciphering pathophysiology and phenotypes of a new disease entity.The Lancet. Respiratory medicine · 2021Review
- COVID-19: time to flatten the infodemic curve.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2021Review
- Access to data from clinical trials in the COVID-19 crisis: open, flexible, and time-sensitive.Journal of clinical epidemiology · 2021Article
- Evaluation of Data Sharing After Implementation of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Data Sharing Statement Requirement.JAMA network open · 2021Article
- COVID-19 impact on research and publication ethics.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2021Article
- Fostering global data sharing: highlighting the recommendations of the Research Data Alliance COVID-19 working group.Wellcome open research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.